Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 1660/08 Generato dall'IA

Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint with broad objective impact on statutory health insurance contributions

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1660/08
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered that the value of the subject matter for the attorney's activity in the constitutional complaint proceedings be set at €40,000 pursuant to § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 of the RVG. The dispute concerned the financial assessment of the scope of the legal matter following a decision by the First Senate’s Third Chamber that granted a constitutional complaint, which resulted in a reduction of statutory health insurance contributions for retirees in numerous cases. The court justified the above-average valuation by determining that while the subjective significance for the individual complainant was low, the objective significance of the decision was high due to its broad impact on many insured persons, necessitating a value exceeding the standard €8,000 baseline under equitable discretion.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 RVG; Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint with broad objective impact on statutory health insurance contributions: 2 Satz 2 of the RVG. The dispute concerned the financial assessment of the scope of the legal matter following a decision by the First Senate’s Third Chamber that granted a constitutional complaint, which resulted in a reduction of statutory health insurance contributions for retirees in numerous cases. The court justified the above-average valuation by determining that while the subjective significance for the individual complainant was low, the objective significance of the decision was high due to its broad impact on many insured persons, necessitating a value exceeding the standard €8,000 baseline under equitable discretion.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
liquidazione degli onorari difensivi oggetto della lite procedura di stima riduzione delle tasse assicurazione malattia motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG
This provision serves as the legal basis for the court's order to set the value of the subject matter for attorney fees at €40,000.
§ 37 Abs. 2 RVG
Der nach § 37 Abs. 2 RVG festzusetzende Gegenstandswert für die anwaltliche Tätigkeit im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren beträgt,

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2295/08
Juni 2009 - 1 BvR 2295/08 -, juris, Rn.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1322/12, 2 BvR 1989/12
Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 916/11, 2 BvR 636/12
Determination of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 571/10
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 859/15, 2 BvR 1651/15, 2 BvR 2006/15, 2 BvR 980/16
Determination of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under § 37 RVG
2 BvR 946/19
Determination of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG

This provision serves as the legal basis for the court's order to set the value of the subject matter for attorney fees at €40,000.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren auf 40000 Euro

[TENOR]

Der Wert des Gegenstandes der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit für das Verfahren der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird auf 40.000 € (in Worten:

vierzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG).

[GRUENDE]

Der nach § 37 Abs. 2 RVG festzusetzende Gegenstandswert für die anwaltliche Tätigkeit im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren beträgt,

wenn der Verfassungsbeschwerde durch die Entscheidung einer Kammer stattgegeben wird, in der Regel, wenn weder die objektive

Bedeutung der Sache noch Umfang und Schwierigkeit der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit Besonderheiten aufweisen, 8.000 € (vgl. BVerfG,

Beschluss der 3. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 2. Juni 2009 - 1 BvR 2295/08 -, juris, Rn. 30).

Während die subjektive Bedeutung der Rechtssache für den Beschwerdeführer eher gering ist und unterhalb des Wertes von 8.000

€ liegt, ist die objektive Bedeutung der Sache erheblich. Denn der stattgebende Kammerbeschluss vom 28. September 2010 wird

im Ergebnis in einer Vielzahl von Fällen für die Versicherten zu einer Reduktion der Beiträge zur Krankenversicherung der

Rentner führen. Es erscheint daher unter Berücksichtigung aller Umstände nach billigem Ermessen angemessen, einen Gegenstandswert

von 40.000 € anzusetzen.