Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 2298/10 Generato dall'IA

Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint against assembly ban for lack of general constitutional significance

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2298/10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to hear the constitutional complaint, rendering the decision final and unappealable, which left the lower court's prohibition of the assembly in force. The dispute concerned a challenge to a specific ban on a public assembly, where the complainant argued the restriction violated their fundamental rights. The Court refused to accept the case for decision on the basis that the complaint lacked general constitutional significance and was not necessary for the enforcement of the complainant's fundamental rights, citing § 93a Abs. 2 and § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) as the decisive legal grounds for the non-acceptance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint against assembly ban for lack of general constitutional significance: The dispute concerned a challenge to a specific ban on a public assembly, where the complainant argued the restriction violated their fundamental rights. The Court refused to accept the case for decision on the basis that the complaint lacked general constitutional significance and was not necessary for the enforcement of the complainant's fundamental rights, citing § 93a Abs. 2 and § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) as the decisive legal grounds for the non-acceptance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritti fondamentali pubblica udienza ragione di polizia decisione d'esecuzione ricorso costituzionale all'estero costituzionalità delle leggi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Basis for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint due to lack of general constitutional significance and necessity.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural basis for omitting a further detailed reasoning in the decision.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvQ 48/21
Constitutional complaint against assembly ban; insufficient substantiation of urgent interim relief requirements
1 BvR 1005/20
Constitutional complaint challenging a public assembly ban: denial of interim relief due to failure to exhaust administrative court emergency remedies
2 BvR 1399/09, 2 BvR 1493/09
Constitutional complaints: non-acceptance without reasoning under § 23a BVerfGG
2 BvR 1452/15
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint without reasoning
2 BvR 1089/18
Constitutional complaint not accepted for decision without reasoning

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Basis for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint due to lack of general constitutional significance and necessity.

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural basis for omitting a further detailed reasoning in the decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Versammlungsverbot

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil ihr keine grundsätzliche verfassungsrechtliche Bedeutung

zukommt und es im Übrigen auch nicht zur Durchsetzung der Grundrechte oder grundrechtsgleichen Rechte des Beschwerdeführers

angezeigt ist (vgl. § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG).

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird gemäß § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.