Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 130/10 Generato dall'IA

Determination of subject-matter value and expense reimbursement for lawyer's activity in constitutional interim injunction proceedings

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 130/10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the State of Lower Saxony to reimburse the petitioner’s necessary expenses and fixed the subject-matter value of the lawyer’s activity at €4,000, granting the petitioner relief in this procedural matter. This decision concerned the determination of subject-matter value and cost allocation within proceedings for the issuance of an interim injunction. The ruling applied Section 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) for expense reimbursement and Section 37(2) Sentence 2 of the Court Fees Act (RVG) to establish the monetary value of the legal services rendered.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG, § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG; Determination of subject-matter value and expense reimbursement for lawyer's activity in constitutional interim injunction proceedings: This decision concerned the determination of subject-matter value and cost allocation within proceedings for the issuance of an interim injunction. The ruling applied Section 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) for expense reimbursement and Section 37(2) Sentence 2 of the Court Fees Act (RVG) to establish the monetary value of the legal services rendered.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese legali rimborso delle spese procedimento sommario determinazione del valore litigioso decisioni incidentali durata ragionevole del procedimento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to order the reimbursement of the petitioner's necessary expenses.
§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG
Cited in the dispositive to fix the subject-matter value of the legal activity at 4,000 EUR.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
€ (in Worten: viertausend Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG; vgl. auch BVerfGE 79, 365 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 890/16
Reimbursement of Out-of-Pocket Expenses and Subject Matter Valuation for Successful Preliminary Injunction in Constitutional Complaint
1 BvQ 35/09
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional interim injunction proceedings
1 BvR 249/21
Costs and subject matter value assessment in settled constitutional complaint over free expression injunction
2 BvR 1010/08
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and provisional injunction proceedings; refusal of out-of-pocket expense reimbursement
1 BvR 1246/20
Scope of cost reimbursement and subject matter value assessment in constitutional complaints resolved by declaration following interim relief

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to order the reimbursement of the petitioner's necessary expenses.

§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG

Cited in the dispositive to fix the subject-matter value of the legal activity at 4,000 EUR.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung und Anordnung der Kostenerstattung im Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung

[TENOR]

Das Land Niedersachsen hat dem Beschwerdeführer seine notwendigen Auslagen für das Verfahren betreffend den Antrag auf Erlass

einer einstweiligen Anordnung zu erstatten (§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG).

Der Wert des Gegenstandes der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird für das Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung auf 4.000

€ (in Worten: viertausend Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG; vgl. auch BVerfGE 79, 365 ).