Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvR 508/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2024:rs20241029.2bvr050821 Generato dall'IA

Exclusion of constitutional court judge from subsequent complaint proceedings due to prior ex officio participation in the underlying administrative judgment

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 508/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court issued a decision ordering the exclusion of a specific judge from the exercise of his judicial office, ruling that he was disqualified from participating in the constitutional complaint proceedings (Case 2 BvR 508/21) due to prior involvement in the underlying matter. The dispute concerned a procedural motion for recusal within a constitutional complaint proceeding, where the core issue was the judge’s prior participation as a member of the Higher Administrative Court for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia in the original administrative dispute (Case No. 4 A 1361/15). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG, which mandates the exclusion of constitutional court judges from a case if they have previously acted in the same matter ex officio in the prior instances, thereby establishing that the judge's prior role in the administrative decision-making process constitutes a valid ground for mandatory disqualification.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG; Exclusion of constitutional court judge from subsequent complaint proceedings due to prior ex officio participation in the underlying administrative judgment: The dispute concerned a procedural motion for recusal within a constitutional complaint proceeding, where the core issue was the judge’s prior participation as a member of the Higher Administrative Court for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia in the original administrative dispute (Case No. 4 A 1361/15). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG, which mandates the exclusion of constitutional court judges from a case if they have previously acted in the same matter ex officio in the prior instances, thereby establishing that the judge's prior role in the administrative decision-making process constitutes a valid ground for mandatory disqualification.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
reclamo amministrativo previo cause di esclusione oggetto della lite questioni processuali partecipazione alla procedura domanda di ricusazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG

Ground for the exclusion of the judge from the exercise of his judicial office due to prior involvement in the same matter.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ausschluss eines Verfassungsrichters von der Mitwirkung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren wegen Vorbefassung von Amts wegen (Mitwirkung im fachgerichtlichen Verfahren)

[TENOR]

Der Richter Wöckel ist von der Ausübung seines Richteramtes ausgeschlossen, weil er in derselben Sache vor seiner Ernennung zum Richter des Bundesverfassungsgerichts im Ausgangsverfahren von Amts wegen tätig gewesen ist (§ 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG). Er hat an dem im fachgerichtlichen Verfahren ergangenen Urteil des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen vom 19. März 2019 - 4 A 1361/15 - mitgewirkt.