Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 StR 527/18 ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:081118B1STR527.18.0 Generato dall'IA

Joint and several liability designation in confiscation order for co-perpetrated offenses

Numero d'incarto 1 StR 527/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Court of Justice rejected the defendant's appeal as unfounded but amended the judgment to correct the confiscation order, reducing the value-replacement amount from EUR 133,142.83 to EUR 120,827 and explicitly designating the defendant's liability as joint and several (Gesamtschuldner); the defendant bore the costs of the appeal. The dispute centered on a calculation error in the confiscation of value replacement for proceeds obtained through crime committed with an unknown accomplice, where the original lower court judgment had failed to specify the joint and several nature of the liability despite the established factual findings of co-perpetration. The decisive legal basis involved the correction of mathematical errors in confiscation amounts to match the actual asset flow to the defendant and the mandatory procedural requirement to designate joint and several liability in the operative part of the judgment when offenses are committed with an accomplice, eliminating the need to identify the unknown co-offenders.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 473 Abs. 4 StPO; Joint and several liability designation in confiscation order for co-perpetrated offenses: The dispute centered on a calculation error in the confiscation of value replacement for proceeds obtained through crime committed with an unknown accomplice, where the original lower court judgment had failed to specify the joint and several nature of the liability despite the established factual findings of co-perpetration. The decisive legal basis involved the correction of mathematical errors in confiscation amounts to match the actual asset flow to the defendant and the mandatory procedural requirement to designate joint and several liability in the operative part of the judgment when offenses are committed with an accomplice, eliminating the need to identify the unknown co-offenders.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
responsabilità solidale prodotto del reato decisioni incidentali valore litigioso dispositivo della sentenza e-justice

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 473 Abs. 4 StPO
Cited as the legal basis for denying the defendant's request for partial relief from the costs and expenses incurred by the appeal.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
4 StR 169/18
August 2018 - 4 StR 169/18).
2 StR 245/18
Juli 2018 - 2 StR 245/18 Rn.
4 StR 63/18
Attribution of criminal proceeds in joint offenses: Requirement of co-disposal power for confiscation of co-offenders' shares
Generato dall'IA
4 StR 466/22
Joint and several liability for confiscation of criminal proceeds shared between co-perpetrators
4 StR 119/24
Confiscation of criminal proceeds: Joint and several liability of co-perpetrators in the operative part of the judgment
2 StR 518/24
Scope of joint and several liability for confiscation of criminal proceeds in offenses committed with unknown co-perpetrators
3 StR 428/20
Confiscation of criminal proceeds: joint and several liability of co-perpetrators with factual co-disposition power
6 StR 63/23
Correction of confiscation order to impose joint and several liability for criminal proceeds

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 473 Abs. 4 StPO

Cited as the legal basis for denying the defendant's request for partial relief from the costs and expenses incurred by the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kennzeichnung einer gesamtschuldnerischen Haftung im Urteilstenor

[TENOR]

Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts München I vom 4. Juli 2018 wird mit der Maßgabe als unbegründet verworfen, dass die Einziehung von Wertersatz in Höhe von 120.827 Euro als Gesamtschuldner angeordnet wird.

Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.

Wie vom Generalbundesanwalt beantragt, war die Reduzierung des Einziehungsbetrages von 133.142,83 Euro auf 120.827 Euro bei gleichzeitiger Kennzeichnung der Haftung des Angeklagten als Gesamtschuldner vorzunehmen. Nur in Höhe dieses Betrages sind entsprechend den Feststellungen des Landgerichts dem Angeklagten Vermögenswerte zugeflossen, so dass der entsprechende Rechenfehler richtigzustellen war (BGH, Beschluss vom 16. August 2018 - 4 StR 169/18). Da der Angeklagte nach den Urteilsfeststellungen die Taten zumindest mit einem unbekannten Mittäter begangen hat, war gleichzeitig die Haftung des Angeklagten als Gesamtschuldner im Tenor nachzuholen (BGH, Beschluss vom 18. Juli 2018 - 2 StR 245/18 Rn. 9 f.), ohne dass es einer Angabe des/der unbekannt gebliebenen Mittäter bedarf (BGH, Urteil vom 7. Juni 2018 - 4 StR 63/18 Rn. 16).

Der nur geringfügige Erfolg der Revision rechtfertigt es nicht, den Angeklagten teilweise von den durch sein Rechtsmittel entstandenen Kosten und Auslagen freizustellen (§ 473 Abs. 4 StPO).

Raum

Bellay

Bär

Hohoff

Pernice