Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 StR 417/16 ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:270916B5STR417.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Conflict of measures under § 55 Abs. 2 StGB vs. § 67f StGB: Maintaining prior detoxification placement when all offenses predate earlier judgment

Numero d'incarto 5 StR 417/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Court of Criminal Court (BGH) rejected the defendant's appeal as unfounded but modified the judgment by vacating the newly ordered measure of placement in a detoxification facility, thereby upholding the measure previously ordered by the Berlin Regional Court in a separate 2015 conviction. The case involved drug offenses where all adjudicated acts predated a prior 2015 judgment, and the dispute centered on the correct application of total sentencing rules to concurrent measures of correction and prevention. The court held that under the priority of § 55 Abs. 2 StGB over § 67f StGB, when all offenses precede an earlier judgment, the previously ordered measure remains in force and any newly ordered measure in the subsequent judgment must be annulled, while affirming that the lower court's refusal to order advance execution of a portion of the total custodial sentence was legally sound.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 349 Abs. 4 StPO, § 349 Abs. 2 StPO, § 64 StGB, § 55 Abs. 2 StGB, § 67f StGB, § 67 Abs. 2 StGB; Conflict of measures under § 55 Abs. 2 StGB vs. § 67f StGB: Maintaining prior detoxification placement when all offenses predate earlier judgment: The case involved drug offenses where all adjudicated acts predated a prior 2015 judgment, and the dispute centered on the correct application of total sentencing rules to concurrent measures of correction and prevention. The court held that under the priority of § 55 Abs. 2 StGB over § 67f StGB, when all offenses precede an earlier judgment, the previously ordered measure remains in force and any newly ordered measure in the subsequent judgment must be annulled, while affirming that the lower court's refusal to order advance execution of a portion of the total custodial sentence was legally sound.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione delle pene e delle misure norma di conflitto prevenzione dei conflitti collocamento per trattamento disintossicante decisione d'esecuzione commisurazione della pena per stupefacenti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 349 Abs. 4 StPO
Procedural basis for modifying the judgment to remove the newly ordered measure while dismissing the appeal.
§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO
Legal ground for dismissing the appeal as unfounded.
§ 64 StGB
Substantive provision regarding the order of placement in a detoxification facility that was modified in the final decision.
§ 55 Abs. 2 StGB
Wegen des Vorrangs von § 55 Abs. 2 StGB vor § 67f StGB war deshalb die in dieser Verurteilung angeordnete Maßregel aufrechtzuerhalten; die neuerlich angeordnete Maßregel hat zu entfallen (vgl.
§ 67f StGB
2 StGB vor § 67f StGB war deshalb die in dieser Verurteilung angeordnete Maßregel aufrechtzuerhalten; die neuerlich angeordnete Maßregel hat zu entfallen (vgl.
§ 67 Abs. 2 StGB
Die Entscheidung des Landgerichts, keinen Vorwegvollzug eines Teils der verhängten Gesamtfreiheitsstrafe (§ 67 Abs. 2 StGB) anzuordnen, ist angesichts der vollstreckungsrechtlichen Besonderheiten nicht zu beanstanden.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
4 StR 622/81
Dezember 1981 – 4 StR 622/81, BGHSt 30, 305, und vom 11.
BGHSt 30, 305
Dezember 1981 – 4 StR 622/81, BGHSt 30, 305, und vom 11.
4 StR 287/97
September 1997 – 4 StR 287/97, NStZ 1998, 97).
Generato dall'IA
3 StR 492/21
Subsequent total sentencing takes precedence over new measures of placement in a detoxification facility
4 StR 670/19
Renewal of detoxification facility placement barred when current offense predates prior conviction triggering the measure
3 StR 406/10
Priority of cumulative sentencing over new § 64 StGB placement when the offense predates the prior conviction
1 StR 254/16
Conflict between psychiatric hospitalization and detoxification facility: Mandatory examination of proportionality under § 72 StGB for concurrent alcohol dependency
4 StR 170/20
Prior imprisonment before commitment to detoxification despite ongoing successful therapeutic measure

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 349 Abs. 4 StPO

Procedural basis for modifying the judgment to remove the newly ordered measure while dismissing the appeal.

§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO

Legal ground for dismissing the appeal as unfounded.

§ 64 StGB

Substantive provision regarding the order of placement in a detoxification facility that was modified in the final decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Strafverfahren wegen Betäubungsmitteldelikten: Anordnung der Unterbringung in einer Entziehungsanstalt und deren Aufrechterhaltung bei nachträglicher Gesamtstrafenbildung

[TENOR]

Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 16. März 2016 wird mit der Maßgabe (§ 349 Abs. 4 StPO) nach § 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegründet verworfen, dass die Anordnung der Maßregel (§ 64 StGB) entfällt; die Anordnung der Unterbringung des Angeklagten in der Entziehungsanstalt im Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 23. Februar 2015 – (528 KLs) 251 Js 683/15 (36/14) – wird aufrechterhalten.

Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.

Das Landgericht hat bei der Entscheidung über die Anordnung der Unterbringung des Angeklagten in einer Entziehungsanstalt (§ 64 StGB) nicht bedacht, dass sämtliche abgeurteilte Taten zeitlich vor dem Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 23. Februar 2015 begangen wurden. Wegen des Vorrangs von § 55 Abs. 2 StGB vor § 67f StGB war deshalb die in dieser Verurteilung angeordnete Maßregel aufrechtzuerhalten; die neuerlich angeordnete Maßregel hat zu entfallen (vgl. BGH, Urteile vom 10. Dezember 1981 – 4 StR 622/81, BGHSt 30, 305, und vom 11. September 1997 – 4 StR 287/97, NStZ 1998, 97). Die Entscheidung des Landgerichts, keinen Vorwegvollzug eines Teils der verhängten Gesamtfreiheitsstrafe (§ 67 Abs. 2 StGB) anzuordnen, ist angesichts der vollstreckungsrechtlichen Besonderheiten nicht zu beanstanden.

Dölp König Berger

Bellay Feilcke