Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
In the matter of Article 146 of the Constitution, Michalakis Miltiadou v. The Republic of Cyprus, through the Public Service Commission, (an Independent Body) (1969) JSC 567 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional challenge to public service scheme dismissed; applicant lacks standing due to non-qualifying qualifications.

Numero d'incarto In the matter of Article 146 of the Constitution, Michalakis Miltiadou v. The Republic of Cyprus, through the Public Service Commission, (an Independent Body) (1969) JSC 567
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Cipro (CY)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's constitutional challenge to his appointment as a Statistics Assistant, 1st Grade. The applicant argued that his Beirut certificate and seventeen years of experience satisfied alternative qualification requirements under a different service scheme, which he claimed should apply by analogy. The court rejected this, holding that the specific scheme for the 1st Grade post explicitly excluded such alternative qualifications and was adopted after the previous scheme, indicating a deliberate intent to exclude them. Consequently, the applicant lacked the necessary locus standi under Article 146 of the Constitution to challenge the appointment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 146 para. 2 of the Constitution; The applicant lacks locus standi to challenge a public service appointment where the specific scheme of service excludes alternative qualifications that may satisfy a different, earlier scheme, and the court will not imply such exclusions into the current statutory framework.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
locus standi public service scheme constitutional challenge alternative qualifications statutory interpretation appointment eligibility Constitutional Article 146 servizio pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 146 para. 2 of the Constitution
All in all he was not qualified for appointment to the subject post and hence the application must fail on the ground that he lacks the locus standi required for an application under Art. 146, para.
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

[*567] 1969 April 23

(STAVRINIDES, J.)

REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

In the matter of Article 146 of the Constitution

Michalakis Miltiadou,

Applicant,

and

The Republic of Cyprus, through

the Public Service Commission,

(an Independent Body),

Respondent.

(Case No. 258/66).

Public Officers - Appointments - Post of Statistics Assistant 1st Grade

- Scheme of service - Applicant not qualified thereunder - Alternative qualifications possessed by him intended to be excluded for the purposes of such scheme - Application dismissed.

L. Clerides, for the Applicant.

M. Spanos, Counsel of the Republic, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

The following Judgment was delivered by:-

STAVRINIDES, J.: The applicant, a Statistics Assistant, 2nd Grade, in the Department of Statistics and Research of the Government, is seeking to annul an appointment to the post of Statistics Assistant, 1st Grade (hereafter “the subject post”), in that Department. So far as relevant, the scheme of service relating to the subject post (exh. 3 pp. 3 and 4, [*568] and exh. 1, hereafter “the subject scheme”) requires

“(b) One of the following qualifications -

(i) Registered Statistical Assistant of the Association of Incorporated Statisticians and a minimum of eight years’ statistical experience;

(ii) Intermediate of the Association of Incorporated Statisticians and a minimum of six years’ statistical experience”.

The applicant does not possess either of the qualifications set out in (i) or (ii) above other than statistical experience. But he

is a holder of a certificate of the International Statistical Education Centre, Beirut, which, as appears from a letter sent by the Director General of the Ministry of Finance to the

Chairman, Public Service Commission, dated October 12, 1963 (exh. 4), is “considered to be equivalent to those mentioned in para. (b)” of the scheme of service relating to the post of Statistics Assistant, 2nd Grade (hereafter “the 2nd Grade post”). Also Mr. Clerides for the applicant stated, without being contradicted, that his client had had seventeen years’ statistical experience; and he argued that in view of that certificate, coupled with such experience, his client was eligible for appointment to the subject post. Mr. Clerides’s argument may be put in this way: one of the qualifications required by the scheme of service relating to the 2nd Grade post (exh. 3, p. 4, hereafter “the other scheme”) is [*569]

“(b) One of the following examinations or another examination of equivalent standard -

(i) Registered Statistical Assistant of the Association of Incorporated Statisticians and a minimum of five years’ statistical experience;

(ii) Intermediate of the Association of Incorporated Statisticians and a minimum of three years’ statistical experience.”

To obtain the certificate of the International Statistical Education centre, Beirut, the applicant had passed an examination (hereafter “the Beirut examination”) which was recognized, for the purposes of the other scheme, as “another examination of equivalent standard” to that required for becoming a “Registered Statistical Assistant of the Association of Incorporated Statisticians” and therefore, coupled with a minimum of five years’ statistical experience, satisfies the requirements of para. (b) (i) of that scheme. Since what para. (b) (i) of the subject scheme requires is, length of statistical experience apart, the same as what is required by para. (b) (i) of the other scheme and the applicant possesses seventeen years’ such experience, the Beirut examination “cannot be disregarded - it is within the spirit of the subject scheme”. This is an ingenious argument, but I cannot uphold it. The very fact that no mention of “another examination of equivalent standard”, or any other set of words to the same effect, appears in the subject scheme shows that it was intended to exclude such an alternative [*570] qualification for the purposes of that scheme; and none the less so when one takes into account that (as appears from a note at the bottom of the subject scheme and of the other scheme, as set out at pp. 4 and 3 of exh. 3 respectively), the subject scheme was adopted several years after the other scheme, so that when it was being prepared the alternative requirement contained in para. (b) (i) must have been considered and rejected.

It follows that the examination relied upon by the applicant is one that does not satisfy the subject scheme and therefore the fact that he has seventeen years’ experience cannot make any difference. All in all he was not qualified for appointment to the subject post and hence the application must fail on the ground that he lacks the locus standi required for an application under Art. 146, para. (2), of the Constitution.

Application dismissed with

£10 costs.