Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2024.00278 • VG ZH VB.2024.00278 Generato dall'IA

Lawyer Deletion Upheld Due to Provisional Default Certificate

Numero d'incarto VB.2024.00278
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative court dismissed an appeal challenging the deletion from the professional register of lawyers because the appellant had a provisional certificate of default, which constitutes a mandatory ground for deletion under relevant law, leaving no room for discretionary consideration by the authority, and the pending nature of a related administrative proceeding did not render the current matter moot.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Löschung im Anwaltsregister | Keine Gegenstandslosigkeit wegen Löschungsgrund im anderen Verfahren (E. 1). Provisorischer Verlustschein stellt Löschungsgrund dar; kein Ermessensspielraum (E. 3). Abweisung.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inadempienza amministrativa ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria autorizzazione provvisoria all'esercizio professionale omissione del difensore cancellazione del marchio professioni giudiziarie

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 5 Abs. I BGFA
This provision regarding the grounds for deletion was implicitly used to address the appellant's argument on lack of discretion, which relates to the existence of mandatory deletion grounds.
Art. 7 BGFA
This provision concerning the competence/procedure was potentially applied in the context of the deletion decision under review.
Art. 8 Abs. I lit. b BGFA
The court confirmed that the provisional certificate of debt constituted a ground for deletion mentioned in this provision.
Art. 8 Abs. I lit. c BGFA
The court confirmed that the provisional certificate of debt constituted a ground for deletion mentioned in this provision.
Art. 9 BGFA
The appeal was rejected based on this provision concerning the grounds for deletion from the bar register.
Art. 38 AnwG
This provision was used to address the procedural issue of the case becoming moot due to deletion in another proceeding.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2013.00086
Lawyer Reinstatement Appeal Over Provisional Loss Certificate
VB.2005.00276
Attorney Removal Upheld Due to Provisional Debt Acknowledgments
VB.2012.00460
Attorney Bar Deletion for Outstanding Loss Certificates

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 9 BGFA

The appeal was rejected based on this provision concerning the grounds for deletion from the bar register.

Art. 8 Abs. I lit. b BGFA

The court confirmed that the provisional certificate of debt constituted a ground for deletion mentioned in this provision.

Art. 8 Abs. I lit. c BGFA

The court confirmed that the provisional certificate of debt constituted a ground for deletion mentioned in this provision.

Art. 5 Abs. I BGFA

This provision regarding the grounds for deletion was implicitly used to address the appellant's argument on lack of discretion, which relates to the existence of mandatory deletion grounds.

Art. 7 BGFA

This provision concerning the competence/procedure was potentially applied in the context of the deletion decision under review.

Art. 38 AnwG

This provision was used to address the procedural issue of the case becoming moot due to deletion in another proceeding.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2024.00278

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224869&W10_KEY=13317463&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2024.00278 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 10.04.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Anwaltsrecht · Betreff: · Löschung im Anwaltsregister · Keine Gegenstandslosigkeit wegen Löschungsgrund im anderen Verfahren (E. 1). Provisorischer Verlustschein stellt Löschungsgrund dar; kein Ermessensspielraum (E. 3). Abweisung. · --- · Stichworte: · ANWALTS- UND NOTARIATSRECHT ANWALTSREGISTER ERMESSENSSPIELRAUM GEGENSTANDSLOSIGKEIT LÖSCHUNG PROVISORISCHER VERLUSTSCHEIN VERLUSTSCHEIN · Rechtsnormen: · § 38 AnwG Art. 5 Abs. I BGFA Art. 7 BGFA Art. 8 Abs. I lit. b BGFA Art. 8 Abs. I lit. c BGFA Art. 9 BGFA · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4