Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2023.00195 • VG ZH VB.2023.00195 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Interim Decision on Committee Member Exclusion Ruled Inadmissible Due to Lack of Appealable Final Order

Numero d'incarto VB.2023.00195
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging an interim decision regarding the exclusion of an administrative investigation committee member, where the underlying administrative procedure could not be concluded with a formal order as defined by the relevant statute. The court ruled that an appeal against an interim decision concerning exclusion is inadmissible if no appeal is available against the final decision of the matter itself; therefore, since the underlying administrative investigation's conclusion did not permit a final order appealable under the cited provision, the appeal against the interim decision on exclusion was dismissed for non-admittance.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Administrativuntersuchung (Ausstand) | Die Anfechtung eines Zwischenentscheids betreffend den Ausstand ist ausgeschlossen, wenn gegen den Endentscheid kein Rechtsmittel offensteht. In diesem Sinn steht die Beschwerde gegen einen Entscheid betreffend Ausstand namentlich dann nicht offen, wenn das Ausstandsgesuch - wie hier - ein Verfahren betrifft, das nicht mit einer Anordnung im Sinn von § 19 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG abgeschlossen werden kann (zum Ganzen E. 2). Nichteintreten.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
misura di allontanamento inchiesta amministrativa eccezioni processuali tardive revoca della decisione amministrativa decisione incidentale impugnabile inesigibilità dell'esecuzione dell'allontanamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 55a PG
The court relied on this provision to establish that the appeal against the decision on the objection of bias was inadmissible because the underlying procedure could not be concluded with an order as per § 19 para. 1 lit. a VRG, leading to non-admission of the appeal (Nichteintreten).
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. e OG
This procedural rule was used to reject the application for legal aid, as the application was rejected.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2019.00855
Appeal Inadmissibility Regarding Limitation and Stay of Administrative Appeal Proceedings
PP220011
Appeal Against Procedural Order of Party Removal Deemed Inadmissible
RT230134
Appeal Against Procedural Order Dismissed for Inadmissibility
VB.2013.00243
Interim Administrative Suspension Appeal Dismissed
UV.2010.00246
Appeal Inadmissibility Regarding Mandated Expert Evaluation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 55a PG

The court relied on this provision to establish that the appeal against the decision on the objection of bias was inadmissible because the underlying procedure could not be concluded with an order as per § 19 para. 1 lit. a VRG, leading to non-admission of the appeal (Nichteintreten).

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. e OG

This procedural rule was used to reject the application for legal aid, as the application was rejected.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2023.00195

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=223182&W10_KEY=13317021&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2023.00195 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 19.04.2023 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Personalrecht · Betreff: · Administrativuntersuchung (Ausstand) · Die Anfechtung eines Zwischenentscheids betreffend den Ausstand ist ausgeschlossen, wenn gegen den Endentscheid kein Rechtsmittel offensteht. In diesem Sinn steht die Beschwerde gegen einen Entscheid betreffend Ausstand namentlich dann nicht offen, wenn das Ausstandsgesuch - wie hier - ein Verfahren betrifft, das nicht mit einer Anordnung im Sinn von § 19 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG abgeschlossen werden kann (zum Ganzen E. 2). Nichteintreten. · --- · Stichworte: · ADMINISTRATIVUNTERSUCHUNG AUSSTANDSBEGEHREN NICHTEINTRETEN ZWISCHENENTSCHEID · Rechtsnormen: · § 55a PG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4