Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2023.00022 • VG ZH VB.2023.00022 Generato dall'IA

Appeal on Residence Permit Extension Based on Cohabitation Duration

Numero d'incarto VB.2023.00022
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal concerned the refusal to extend a residence permit based on the assertion that the applicant had not met the three-year cohabitation requirement under Art. 50 Para. 1 lit. a of the Foreign Nationals Act (AIG). The court ruled to uphold the appeal, finding that the total duration of the marital community amounted to approximately three years and one month, thereby satisfying the time requirement, and further noting that the applicant fulfilled the integration criteria specified in Art. 58a AIG, thus entitling them to a permit extension under Art. 50 Para. 1 lit. a AIG, despite a dissenting opinion from a minority of the chamber.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Verlängerung der Aufenthaltsbewilligung | [Nichtverlängerung der Aufenthaltsbewilligung wegen Nichterreichens der Dreijahresfrist von Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG] Insgesamt dauerten die zwei Phasen der ehelichen Gemeinschaft rund drei Jahre und ein Monat (E. 2.4.2 ff.). Der Beschwerdeführer erfüllt die Integrationskriterien von Art. 58a AIG. Ihm kommt damit gestützt auf Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG (weiterhin) ein Anspruch auf Verlängerung seiner Aufenthaltsbewilligung zu (E. 2.5). Gutheissung. Abweichende Meinung einer Kammerminderheit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
permessi di dimora protrazione della locazione legge sugli stranieri decisione straniera durata del matrimonio età minore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG
This provision established the appellant's right to an extension of his residence permit because the prerequisite three-year period of marital cohabitation was met.
Art. 58a AIG
This provision was cited in relation to the fulfillment of integration criteria, which supported the right to extension under Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG.
Art. 42 Abs. 1 AIG
This provision was listed under the applicable legal norms, although its specific application in the dispositive orders is not explicitly detailed beyond general context.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2024.00384
Residence Permit Extension Denial Based on Insufficient Cohabitation Period
VB.2017.00497
Foreign National Residence Permit Extension Denial Based on Failed Marriage Duration
VB.2014.00414
Residence Permit Extension Appeal Based on Insufficient Marriage Duration
VB.2020.00076
Residence Permit Extension Denied for Insufficient Marital Cohabitation
VB.2018.00419
Residence Permit Extension Denied Due to Lack of Three-Year Marital Cohabitation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG

This provision established the appellant's right to an extension of his residence permit because the prerequisite three-year period of marital cohabitation was met.

Art. 58a AIG

This provision was cited in relation to the fulfillment of integration criteria, which supported the right to extension under Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG.

Art. 42 Abs. 1 AIG

This provision was listed under the applicable legal norms, although its specific application in the dispositive orders is not explicitly detailed beyond general context.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2023.00022

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=223294&W10_KEY=13317020&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2023.00022 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 08.06.2023 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/4. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Verlängerung der Aufenthaltsbewilligung · [Nichtverlängerung der Aufenthaltsbewilligung wegen Nichterreichens der Dreijahresfrist von Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG] Insgesamt dauerten die zwei Phasen der ehelichen Gemeinschaft rund drei Jahre und ein Monat (E. 2.4.2 ff.). Der Beschwerdeführer erfüllt die Integrationskriterien von Art. 58a AIG. Ihm kommt damit gestützt auf Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG (weiterhin) ein Anspruch auf Verlängerung seiner Aufenthaltsbewilligung zu (E. 2.5). Gutheissung. Abweichende Meinung einer Kammerminderheit. · --- · Stichworte: · AUFENTHALTSANSPRUCH DREIJAHRESFRIST EHEWILLE INTEGRATIONSKRITERIEN · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 42 Abs. 1 AIG Art. 50 Abs. 1 lit. a AIG Art. 58a AIG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4