Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2022.00787 • VG ZH VB.2022.00787 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Execution of Substitute Custodial Sentence Following Criminal Penalty Order

Numero d'incarto VB.2022.00787
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by the district authority to proceed with the execution of a substitute custodial sentence following a criminal penalty order. The appellant contested the validity of the process, arguing that a notice regarding the penalty order was not properly served. The court reasoned that the previous official notification regarding the appeal against the penalty order, which declined to accept the appeal and confirmed the penalty order's legal finality, was deemed legally served on the appellant due to the presumption of delivery, and thus the penalty order became legally binding; since there was no indication that the previous decision or the penalty order itself was void, the substitute custodial sentence was correctly ordered to be executed.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Vorladung in den Strafvollzug | Vorladung in den Strafvollzug. Die Verfügung, mit der das Statthalteramt auf die Einsprache des Beschwerdeführers nicht eintrat und feststellte, dass der Strafbefehl rechtskräftig sei, gilt aufgrund der Zustellfiktion als dem Beschwerdeführer zugestellt und erwuchs in Rechtskraft. Anzeichen dafür, dass diese Verfügung oder der Strafbefehl geradezu nichtig sein könnten, gibt es nicht. Die Ersatzfreiheitsstrafe ist deshalb zu vollziehen (E. 3). Abweisung.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pena detentiva sostitutiva sanzione penale esecuzione delle pene notificazione della decisione controllo della commisurazione della pena autorizzazione all’esecuzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 106 Abs. II StGB
The court based its final order on the principle regarding the execution of the sentence, as the penalty order was deemed legally final.
Art. 372 Abs. II StGB
The court referenced this article in connection with the legal basis for the execution of the sentence.
§ 85 Abs. IV lit. a StPO CH
This procedural rule was referenced in the decision's context, relating to the execution of penalties.
§ 354 Abs. III StPO CH
This procedural rule was referenced in the decision's context, relating to the execution of penalties.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2013.00248
Challenge to Enforcement Orders and Denial of Justice in Substitute Custodial Sentences
RT180123
Appeal Regarding Enforcement of Fine and Substitute Custodial Sentence
VB.2015.00696
Appeal Regarding Substitute Custodial Sentence for Unpaid Fines
VB.2017.00634
Dismissal of Appeal Regarding Execution of Substitute Custodial Sentence Due to Lack of Grounds and Jurisdiction

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 106 Abs. II StGB

The court based its final order on the principle regarding the execution of the sentence, as the penalty order was deemed legally final.

Art. 372 Abs. II StGB

The court referenced this article in connection with the legal basis for the execution of the sentence.

§ 85 Abs. IV lit. a StPO CH

This procedural rule was referenced in the decision's context, relating to the execution of penalties.

§ 354 Abs. III StPO CH

This procedural rule was referenced in the decision's context, relating to the execution of penalties.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2022.00787

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=222947&W10_KEY=13317024&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2022.00787 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 12.01.2023 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Straf- und Massnahmenvollzug · Betreff: · Vorladung in den Strafvollzug · Vorladung in den Strafvollzug. Die Verfügung, mit der das Statthalteramt auf die Einsprache des Beschwerdeführers nicht eintrat und feststellte, dass der Strafbefehl rechtskräftig sei, gilt aufgrund der Zustellfiktion als dem Beschwerdeführer zugestellt und erwuchs in Rechtskraft.

Anzeichen dafür, dass diese Verfügung oder der Strafbefehl geradezu nichtig sein könnten, gibt es nicht. Die Ersatzfreiheitsstrafe ist deshalb zu vollziehen (E. 3). Abweisung. · --- · Stichworte: · ANORDNUNG IM STRAF- UND MASSNAHMENVOLLZUG EINSPRACHE ERSATZFREIHEITSSTRAFE RECHTSKRAFT STRAFBEFEHL ZUSTELLFIKTION · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 106 Abs. II StGB Art. 372 Abs. II StGB § 85 Abs. IV lit. a StPO CH § 354 Abs. III StPO CH · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4