Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2022.00728 • VG ZH VB.2022.00728 Generato dall'IA

Late Family Reunification of Minors Upheld on Best Interests Grounds

Numero d'incarto VB.2022.00728
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court reviewed an appeal regarding the late family reunification of two minor children whose parents had since had another child together and whose mother had moved to the jurisdiction with the father. The court found that the children, nearly 13 and 11, had always been primarily cared for by their mother, who now resided in the jurisdiction with the father and their youngest child and held a residence permit. Furthermore, the only previous care alternative in their home country was no longer available due to the aunt's departure. Therefore, the court concluded that denying the children a residence or settlement permit contradicted their best interests and constituted a disproportionate interference with the right to family life, leading to the granting of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Familiennachzug | [Nachträglicher Familiennachzug von zwei minderjährigen Kindern, nachdem deren Eltern ein weiteres gemeinsames Kind bekommen haben und die Mutter zum Vater in die Schweiz gezogen ist] Die Beschwerdeführerinnen sind fast 13 bzw. 11 Jahre alt. Ihre Mutter war stets ihre Hauptbezugs- und Betreuungsperson. Diese lebt nun gemeinsam mit dem Vater der Beschwerdeführerinnen und dem jüngsten Kind in der Schweiz und verfügt über eine Aufenthaltsbewilligung. Eine Betreuungsalternative in Côte d'Ivoire besteht nicht mehr, seitdem die Tante der Beschwerdeführerinnen weggezogen ist. Die Nichterteilung einer Aufenthalts- bzw. Niederlassungsbewilligung an die Beschwerdeführerinnen widerspricht daher dem Kindeswohl und stellt einen unverhältnismässigen Eingriff in das Recht auf Familienleben dar (E. 5). Gutheissung.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ricongiungimento familiare interesse del figlio diritto di fondare una famiglia diritto di soggiorno figlio unico adozione di minorenni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 43 AIG
This provision forms the basis for granting the subsequent family reunification, aligning with the child's best interests.
Art. 43 Abs. 1 AIG
This specific part of the law regarding family reunification was implicitly applied in granting the request.
Art. 43 Abs. 6 AIG
This specific part of the law regarding family reunification was implicitly applied in granting the request.
Art. 47 AIG
This provision was considered in the context of granting the application for subsequent family reunification.
Art. 47 Abs. 4 AIG
This specific part of the law was considered in the context of granting the application for subsequent family reunification.
Art. 8 EMRK
The court found that the denial violated the right to family life under this article.
Art. 3 KRK
The court's decision was grounded on the child's best interest, as protected by this convention.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2023.00364
Appeal on Late Family Reunification of Minor Child
VB.2003.00334
Family Reunification of Minor Children to Settled Parents Allowed
VB.2022.00417
Appeal Dismissed: Late Family Reunification for Minor Children
VB.2017.00678
Appeal for Late Family Reunification of Minor Son Dismissed
VB.2004.00157
Family Reunification Denial for Minor Children Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 43 AIG

This provision forms the basis for granting the subsequent family reunification, aligning with the child's best interests.

Art. 43 Abs. 1 AIG

This specific part of the law regarding family reunification was implicitly applied in granting the request.

Art. 43 Abs. 6 AIG

This specific part of the law regarding family reunification was implicitly applied in granting the request.

Art. 47 AIG

This provision was considered in the context of granting the application for subsequent family reunification.

Art. 47 Abs. 4 AIG

This specific part of the law was considered in the context of granting the application for subsequent family reunification.

Art. 8 EMRK

The court found that the denial violated the right to family life under this article.

Art. 3 KRK

The court's decision was grounded on the child's best interest, as protected by this convention.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2022.00728

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=223219&W10_KEY=13317461&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2022.00728 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 11.05.2023 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/4. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Familiennachzug · [Nachträglicher Familiennachzug von zwei minderjährigen Kindern, nachdem deren Eltern ein weiteres gemeinsames Kind bekommen haben und die Mutter zum Vater in die Schweiz gezogen ist] Die Beschwerdeführerinnen sind fast 13 bzw. 11 Jahre alt. Ihre Mutter war stets ihre Hauptbezugs- und Betreuungsperson.

Diese lebt nun gemeinsam mit dem Vater der Beschwerdeführerinnen und dem jüngsten Kind in der Schweiz und verfügt über eine Aufenthaltsbewilligung. Eine Betreuungsalternative in Côte d'Ivoire besteht nicht mehr, seitdem die Tante der Beschwerdeführerinnen weggezogen ist. Die Nichterteilung einer Aufenthalts- bzw. Niederlassungsbewilligung an die Beschwerdeführerinnen widerspricht daher dem Kindeswohl und stellt einen unverhältnismässigen Eingriff in das Recht auf Familienleben dar (E. 5). Gutheissung. · --- · Stichworte: · FAMILIENNACHZUG KINDESWOHL NACHTRÄGLICHER FAMILIENNACHZUG VERSPÄTETES GESUCH WICHTIGE GRÜNDE · Rechtsnormen:

· Art. 43 AIG Art. 43 Abs. 1 AIG Art. 43 Abs. 6 AIG Art. 47 AIG Art. 47 Abs. 4 AIG Art. 8 EMRK Art. 3 KRK · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3