Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2022.00642 • VG ZH VB.2022.00642 Generato dall'IA

Late Family Reunification Denied Due to Untimeliness

Numero d'incarto VB.2022.00642
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court upheld the rejection of a late family reunification request, finding that while the applicant's son did not need to be heard, the request itself was untimely. The court determined that no significant family reasons justified late reunification, leading the public interest in limiting immigration to outweigh the applicant's private interest in living in Switzerland, thus not violating her right to family life.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Familiennachzug | [Nachträgliches Gesuch um Familiennachzug] Der Sohn der Beschwerdeführerin muss nicht angehört werden (E. 2). Das Familiennachzugsgesuch der Beschwerdeführerin erweist sich als verspätet (E. 3.4). Insgesamt liegen keine wichtigen familiären Gründe vor, die für die Bewilligung eines nachträglichen Familiennachzugs sprechen würden, weshalb das öffentliche Interesse an der Eingrenzung der Zuwanderung das private Interesse der Beschwerdeführerin an einem Leben in der Schweiz überwiegt. Damit verletzt die Abweisung des Nachzugsgesuchs den Anspruch der Beschwerdeführerin auf Achtung ihres Familienlebens nicht (E. 3.6). Gutheissung UP/Gutheissung URB. Abweisung.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ricongiungimento familiare tardivo domanda d'asilo tardiva diritto di adozione diritto alla vita motivi familiari importanti diritto di essere sentito

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 42 Abs. 1 AIG
This provision is likely relevant to the assessment of applications for residence permits, and its citation indicates it was used in the court's ruling.
Art. 47 Abs. 1 AIG
This provision is cited as the legal basis for assessing family reunification requests, indicating its use in the court's decision regarding the family reunification application.
Art. 47 Abs. 4 AIG
This provision is cited in relation to the conditions for family reunification, suggesting its application in the court's evaluation of the case.
Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV
This provision, concerning the right to be heard, was likely applied by the court in its procedural considerations before reaching the final decision.
Art. 12 Abs. 1 KRK
This provision relates to the child's right to maintain contact with parents and is likely cited as a factor in the court's consideration of the family's best interests.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2017.00069
Family Reunification Denied Due to Untimely Filing and Lack of Compelling Reasons
VB.2015.00647
Family Reunification Permit Denial Upheld Due to Untimely Application and Lack of Compelling Post-Impediment Justification
VB.2019.00237
Family Reunification Appeal Dismissed as Untimely
VB.2015.00512
Late Family Reunification Application Denied

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 47 Abs. 1 AIG

This provision is cited as the legal basis for assessing family reunification requests, indicating its use in the court's decision regarding the family reunification application.

Art. 47 Abs. 4 AIG

This provision is cited in relation to the conditions for family reunification, suggesting its application in the court's evaluation of the case.

Art. 42 Abs. 1 AIG

This provision is likely relevant to the assessment of applications for residence permits, and its citation indicates it was used in the court's ruling.

Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV

This provision, concerning the right to be heard, was likely applied by the court in its procedural considerations before reaching the final decision.

Art. 12 Abs. 1 KRK

This provision relates to the child's right to maintain contact with parents and is likely cited as a factor in the court's consideration of the family's best interests.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2022.00642

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=223292&W10_KEY=13317020&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2022.00642 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 08.06.2023 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/4. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Das Bundesgericht hat eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten gegen diesen Entscheid am 29.08.2024 abgewiesen. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Familiennachzug · [Nachträgliches Gesuch um Familiennachzug] Der Sohn der Beschwerdeführerin muss nicht angehört werden (E. 2). Das Familiennachzugsgesuch der Beschwerdeführerin erweist sich als verspätet (E. 3.4).

Insgesamt liegen keine wichtigen familiären Gründe vor, die für die Bewilligung eines nachträglichen Familiennachzugs sprechen würden, weshalb das öffentliche Interesse an der Eingrenzung der Zuwanderung das private Interesse der Beschwerdeführerin an einem Leben in der Schweiz überwiegt. Damit verletzt die Abweisung des Nachzugsgesuchs den Anspruch der Beschwerdeführerin auf Achtung ihres Familienlebens nicht (E. 3.6). Gutheissung UP/Gutheissung URB. Abweisung. · --- · Stichworte: · AUFENTHALTSBEWILLIGUNG NACHTRÄGLICHER FAMILIENNACHZUG · Rechtsnormen:

· Art. 42 Abs. 1 AIG Art. 47 Abs. 1 AIG Art. 47 Abs. 4 AIG Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV Art. 12 Abs. 1 KRK · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3