Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
MPU.2023.0004 • TC VD MPU.2023.0004 Generato dall'IA

Bid Exclusion Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment of Advance

Numero d'incarto MPU.2023.0004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Vaud (CH-VD)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a municipal decision excluding its bid from a public procurement process concerning scaffolding for a child care center, but the cantonal administrative court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible because the appellant failed to pay the required advance of costs (2,500 francs) by the deadline set by the instructing judge, as stipulated by cantonal administrative procedure law, which mandates inadmissibility if the advance is not paid.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 47 al. 3 LPA-VD, Art. 94 al. 1 let. d LPA-VD, art. 47 al. 2 LPA-VD, art. 56 LPA-VD, art. 91 LPA-VD, art. 55 LPA-VD; Bid Exclusion Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment of Advance: - qu'un juge unique est compétent pour statuer sur les recours manifestement irrecevables (art. 94 al. 1 let. d LPA-VD).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esclusione dalla procedura di appalto versamento dell'anticipo spese appalti pubblici spese amministrative termine di pagamento offerente escluso

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 47 al. 3 LPA-VD
This provision is cited implicitly in the reasoning (the court declares the appeal inadmissible because the advance of costs was not paid as required by art. 47 al. 2 LPA-VD, which leads to the consequence stated in art. 47 al. 3 LPA-VD), and it dictates the court's decision to rule on inadmissibility.
Art. 94 al. 1 let. d LPA-VD
This provision justifies the competence of a single judge to rule on manifestly inadmissible appeals, as mentioned in the considerations preceding the operative part.
art. 47 al. 2 LPA-VD
This provision establishes the general obligation for the appellant to provide an advance of costs, which triggered the procedural consequence leading to the inadmissibility ruling.
art. 56 LPA-VD
This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.
art. 91 LPA-VD
This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.
art. 55 LPA-VD
This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.
art. 52 LPA-VD
This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.
art. 49 LPA-VD
This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.
Generato dall'IA
AC.2018.0007
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Advance on Costs
MPU.2023.0032
Appeal on Public Procurement Decision Inadmissible Due to Unpaid Advance on Costs
AC.2023.0223
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Advance of Costs
AC.2018.0402
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment of Advance Costs
AC.2016.0429
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment of Advance Costs

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 47 al. 3 LPA-VD

This provision is cited implicitly in the reasoning (the court declares the appeal inadmissible because the advance of costs was not paid as required by art. 47 al. 2 LPA-VD, which leads to the consequence stated in art. 47 al. 3 LPA-VD), and it dictates the court's decision to rule on inadmissibility.

art. 47 al. 2 LPA-VD

This provision establishes the general obligation for the appellant to provide an advance of costs, which triggered the procedural consequence leading to the inadmissibility ruling.

art. 94 al. 1 let. d LPA-VD

This provision justifies the competence of a single judge to rule on manifestly inadmissible appeals, as mentioned in the considerations preceding the operative part.

art. 56 LPA-VD

This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.

art. 91 LPA-VD

This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.

art. 55 LPA-VD

This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.

art. 52 LPA-VD

This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.

art. 49 LPA-VD

This article is cited in the consideration stating that the present decision of inadmissibility can be rendered without costs or compensation, which relates to the financial disposition in Order II.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

TRIBUNAL CANTONAL COUR DE DROIT ADMINISTRATIF ET PUBLIC

Arrêt du 8 mars 2023 Composition · M. Guillaume Vianin, président; M. Patrick Gigante, greffier.

Recourante · A.________, à \\\\\\\\,.

Autorité intimée · Municipalité de Lausanne, Service d'architecture et du logement, à Lausanne.

Objet · Marchés publics

Recours A.________ c/ décision du Service d'architecture de la Ville de Lausanne du 31 janvier 2023 (Centre de vie enfantine de Valency - échafaudages - décision d'exclusion)

Vu les faits suivants:

- vu le recours formé le 10 février 2023 par A.________ (ci-après: recourante) contre la décision rendue le 31 janvier 2023 par le Service d'architecture de la Ville de Lausanne, prononçant l’exclusion de son offre de la procédure;

- vu l'ordonnance du juge instructeur du 13 février 2023 impartissant à la recourante un délai au 27 février 2023 pour effectuer une avance de frais, provisoirement fixée à 2’500 fr., avec l'avertissement qu'à défaut de paiement dans le délai fixé, le recours serait déclaré irrecevable;

- attendu qu’aucun versement n'a été enregistré.

Considérant en droit:

- qu’en procédure de recours de droit administratif, le recourant est en principe tenu de fournir une avance de frais (art. 47 al. 2 de la loi cantonale du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative [LPA-VD; BLV 173.36]);

- que l'avance de frais n'a pas été effectuée dans le délai fixé par le juge instructeur;

- que le Tribunal ne peut ainsi pas entrer en matière sur le recours (art. 47 al. 3 LPA-VD);

- que le présent arrêt d'irrecevabilité peut être rendu sans frais ni dépens (art. 49, 52, 55, 56, 91 et 99 LPA-VD);

- qu'un juge unique est compétent pour statuer sur les recours manifestement irrecevables (art. 94 al. 1 let. d LPA-VD).

Par ces motifs la Cour de droit administratif et public du Tribunal cantonal arrête:

I. Le recours est irrecevable.

II. Le présent arrêt est rendu sans frais, ni dépens.

III. Une éventuelle avance de frais tardive sera restituée.

Lausanne, le 8 mars 2023

Le président: Le greffier:

Le présent arrêt est communiqué aux destinataires de l'avis d'envoi ci-joint.

Il peut faire l'objet, dans les trente jours suivant sa notification, d'un recours au Tribunal fédéral (Tribunal fédéral suisse, 1000 Lausanne 14). Le recours en matière de droit public s'exerce aux conditions des articles 82 ss de la loi du 17 juin 2005 sur le Tribunal fédéral (LTF - RS 173.110), le recours constitutionnel subsidiaire à celles des articles 113 ss LTF. Le mémoire de recours doit être rédigé dans une langue officielle, indiquer les conclusions, les motifs et les moyens de preuve, et être signé. Les motifs doivent exposer succinctement en quoi l’acte attaqué viole le droit. Les pièces invoquées comme moyens de preuve doivent être jointes au mémoire, pour autant qu’elles soient en mains de la partie; il en va de même de la décision attaquée.