Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VPB 4828-2003-1563 Generato dall'IA

International Trademark Application Opposition Dismissed

Numero d'incarto VPB 4828-2003-1563
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione (GAAC) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An opposition was filed against an international trademark application based on a Swiss trademark. The opposition was rejected, the applicant was excluded from the proceedings, and the international trademark was allowed for protection in Switzerland. The court's reasoning is not detailed in this document, beyond the exclusion of the defendant and the ultimate decision to allow the mark.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; International Trademark Application Opposition Dismissed: The opposition was rejected, the applicant was excluded from the proceedings, and the international trademark was allowed for protection in Switzerland. The court's reasoning is not detailed in this document, beyond the exclusion of the defendant and the ultimate decision to allow the mark.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
opposizione al marchio opposizione protezione internazionale marchio comunitario procedura civile internazionale ricorso per inadempienza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
This provision likely pertains to the exclusion of a party from proceedings, as indicated by point 1 of the dispositive.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision relates to the costs of the proceedings, as indicated by point 4 of the dispositive.
Art. 64 LTF
This provision relates to the allocation of costs, as indicated by point 5 of the dispositive.
Generato dall'IA
VPB 2000.1245
Opposition to International Trademark Application Sustained Based on Swiss Mark
VPB 2007.321
Opposition Dismissed Due to Applicant Exclusion in Swiss Trademark Case
VPB 2082.2002
Trademark Opposition Dismissed for Non-Participation
VPB 2001.400
International Trademark Protection vs. Swiss Trademark Opposition
VPB 2001.1399
International Trademark Refused in Switzerland Following Opposition Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

This provision likely pertains to the exclusion of a party from proceedings, as indicated by point 1 of the dispositive.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision relates to the costs of the proceedings, as indicated by point 4 of the dispositive.

Art. 64 LTF

This provision relates to the allocation of costs, as indicated by point 5 of the dispositive.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition no 5726

Opposant/e Carolina Herrea Ltd,, 501 Seventh Ave. 17th Floor, US-New York (NY 10018), marque suisse no 485080 CAROLINA HERRERA CHIC, représentée par Kirker & Cie, Conseils en Marques SA, 122, rue de Genève, Case Postale 153, 1226 Thônex contre Défendeur Ulric de Varens S.A., 47, rue Boissière, FR-75116 Paris, marque internationale no 771699 CHIC-ISSIME. Le 17 juillet 2003, l’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a décidé ce qui suit:

1. La défenderesse est exclue de la procédure.

2. L’opposition no 5726/2002 contre la marque internationale no IR-771699 CHIC-ISSIME est rejetée.

3. La marque internationale no IR-771699 CHIC-ISSIME sera acceptée à la protection en Suisse après l’entrée en force de la présente décision.

4. La taxe d’opposition de 800 francs reste acquise à l’Institut.

5. Aucun dépens n’est alloué à la défenderesse.

6. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties; par publication dans la Feuille fédérale pour la partie défenderesse.

Voies de droit: La présente décision peut être attaquée par voie de recours dans les 30 jours à dater de sa notification devant la Commission de recours en matière de propriété intellectuelle, Einsteinstrasse 2, 3003 Berne. Les mémoires de recours doivent être présentés en trois exemplaires.

17 juillet 2003 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

4828 2003-1563 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'opposition n° 5726

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2003 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 29 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 29.07.2003 Date Data

Seite 4828-4828 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 127 532

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.