Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
VPB 2001.2393 Generato dall'IA

Opposition Dismissed Due to Non-Participation

Numero d'incarto VPB 2001.2393
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione (GAAC) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali senza spese

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An opposition was filed against an international trademark application based on an earlier Swiss trademark. The Federal Institute of Intellectual Property excluded the defendant from the procedure and rejected the opposition, thereby withdrawing the earlier provisional refusal of the trademark. This decision was made because the defendant failed to participate in the opposition proceedings, leading to the dismissal of their case.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 34 al. 2 MCP, Art. 43 al. 1 MCP, Art. 62 al. 1 MCP, Art. 62 al. 2 MCP; Opposition Dismissed Due to Non-Participation: The Federal Institute of Intellectual Property excluded the defendant from the procedure and rejected the opposition, thereby withdrawing the earlier provisional refusal of the trademark. This decision was made because the defendant failed to participate in the opposition proceedings, leading to the dismissal of their case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
opposizione al marchio opposizione casi di esclusione istituto di proprietà intellettuale decisione di non sollevare obiezioni esclusione dal consorzio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 34 al. 2 MCP
This article is implicitly referred to in point 2 of the dispositive, which states that the opposition is rejected. While not explicitly cited, this is the standard provision for rejecting an opposition.
Art. 43 al. 1 MCP
This article is implicitly referred to in point 1 of the dispositive, which states that the defendant is excluded from the procedure. This typically occurs due to a failure to meet procedural requirements, which would fall under this article.
Art. 62 al. 1 MCP
This article is referred to in point 4 of the dispositive concerning the opposition fee remaining with the Institute.
Art. 62 al. 2 MCP
This article is implicitly referred to in point 5 of the dispositive, which states that no compensation for costs is awarded. This usually follows from a decision where costs are not ordered.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 34 al. 2 MCP

This article is implicitly referred to in point 2 of the dispositive, which states that the opposition is rejected. While not explicitly cited, this is the standard provision for rejecting an opposition.

Art. 43 al. 1 MCP

This article is implicitly referred to in point 1 of the dispositive, which states that the defendant is excluded from the procedure. This typically occurs due to a failure to meet procedural requirements, which would fall under this article.

Art. 62 al. 1 MCP

This article is referred to in point 4 of the dispositive concerning the opposition fee remaining with the Institute.

Art. 62 al. 2 MCP

This article is implicitly referred to in point 5 of the dispositive, which states that no compensation for costs is awarded. This usually follows from a decision where costs are not ordered.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition n° 4626 / 2000

Opposante, Cooper Cosmetics S.A., 43, chemin Armand Dufaux, représenté par Kirker & Cie, Conseils en Marques SA, 122, rue de Genève, 1226 Thônex, Marque suisse n° P-296 595 «PRITTY», contre Défenderesse, BIPA Parfümerien Gesellschaft m.b.H., Industriezentrum Nö-Süd Strasse 2 Objekt 16, A-2355 Wiener Neudorf (Autriche) (pas de représentation), Marque internationale n° 735 159 « b : pretty », L’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a, le 31 octobre 2001, décidé:

1. La défenderesse est exclue de la procédure.

2. L’opposition n° 4626 contre la marque internationale n° 735 159 « b : pretty » est rejetée.

3. Le refus provisoire total du 11 décembre 2000 sera retiré dès que la présente décision sera entrée en force.

4. La taxe d’opposition reste acquise à l’Institut.

5. Il n’est pas alloué de dépens.

6. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties, par publication dans la Feuille fédérale pour la partie défenderesse.

Voies de droit La présente décision peut être attaquée par voie de recours dans les 30 jours à dater de sa notification devant la Commission de recours en matière de propriété intellectuelle, Einsteinstrasse 2, 3003 Berne. Les mémoires de recours doivent être présentés en trois exemplaires. Une copie de la décision attaquée est à joindre aux mémoires de recours.

31 octobre 2001 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

2001-2393 5715 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'opposition n° 4626 / 2000

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2001 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 45 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 13.11.2001 Date Data

Seite 5715-5715 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 125 790

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.