Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VPB 1426-2005-0349 Generato dall'IA

OlymPeace Trademark Opposition Proceedings

Numero d'incarto VPB 1426-2005-0349
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione (GAAC) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An international trademark application for "OlymPeace" was opposed by the owner of the Swiss trademark "THE OLYMPICS". The opposition was declared well-founded, leading to the exclusion of the defendant from the proceedings and a definitive refusal of the "OlymPeace" trademark. The court ruled that the "OlymPeace" mark was too similar to the existing "THE OLYMPICS" mark, creating a likelihood of confusion and potentially benefiting from the Olympic reputation, and therefore ordered the defendant to pay costs and a refund of the opposition fee.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a lit. b CPI, Art. 108 al. 1 let. a CPI, Art. 66 al. 1 CPI, Art. 67 al. 1 CPI; OlymPeace Trademark Opposition Proceedings: The opposition was declared well-founded, leading to the exclusion of the defendant from the proceedings and a definitive refusal of the "OlymPeace" trademark. The court ruled that the "OlymPeace" mark was too similar to the existing "THE OLYMPICS" mark, creating a likelihood of confusion and potentially benefiting from the Olympic reputation, and therefore ordered the defendant to pay costs and a refund of the opposition fee.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
opposizione al marchio opposizione misura di allontanamento marchio comunitario concorrenza internazionale marchio olfattivo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a lit. b CPI
This article is implicitly cited as the basis for declaring the opposition well-founded and consequently refusing the trademark, leading to the exclusion of the defendant from the proceedings.
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a CPI
This article is implicitly cited as the basis for declaring the opposition well-founded and consequently refusing the trademark.
Art. 66 al. 1 CPI
This provision governs the decision on the costs of the opposition proceedings, specifically the acquisition of the opposition fee by the Institute and the payment of costs by the defendant.
Art. 67 al. 1 CPI
This provision governs the decision on the costs of the opposition proceedings, specifically the payment of costs by the defendant to the opponent.
Generato dall'IA
VPB 4828-2003-1563
International Trademark Application Opposition Dismissed
VPB 2001.1399
International Trademark Refused in Switzerland Following Opposition Proceedings
VPB 2000.1245
Opposition to International Trademark Application Sustained Based on Swiss Mark
VPB 5588-2001-2180
Opposition of International Trademark Registration Upheld Due to Likelihood of Confusion
VPB 2003.1796
CHOIR OLYMPICS Trademark Opposition - Likelihood of Confusion with OLYMPIC GAMES

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a lit. b CPI

This article is implicitly cited as the basis for declaring the opposition well-founded and consequently refusing the trademark, leading to the exclusion of the defendant from the proceedings.

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a CPI

This article is implicitly cited as the basis for declaring the opposition well-founded and consequently refusing the trademark.

Art. 66 al. 1 CPI

This provision governs the decision on the costs of the opposition proceedings, specifically the acquisition of the opposition fee by the Institute and the payment of costs by the defendant.

Art. 67 al. 1 CPI

This provision governs the decision on the costs of the opposition proceedings, specifically the payment of costs by the defendant to the opponent.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition n° 7177/2004

Opposante Comité International Olympique, Château de Vidy, 1007 Lausanne, marque suisse n° 501446 THE OLYMPICS, représentée par ABREMA Agence Brevets et Marques, Avenue du Théâtre 16, 1002 Lausanne contre Défenderesse Monsieur R. Jaimen McMillan, 129 Jayes Road, Schuylerville, US-New York 12871 (Etats-Unis d’Amérique), marque internationale n° 823403 «OlymPeace». Le 10 février 2005, l’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a décidé ce qui suit:

1. La défenderesse est exclue de la procédure.

2. L’opposition n° 7177/2004 contre la marque internationale n° 823403 «OlymPeace» est déclarée bien fondée.

3. Il sera émis à l’encontre de la marque internationale n° 823403 «Olym- Peace» une déclaration de refus total définitive une fois la présente décision entrée en force.

4. La taxe d’opposition de 800 francs reste acquise à l’Institut.

5. Il est mis à la charge de la défenderesse le paiement à l’opposante d’une somme de 1800 francs à titre de dépens et de remboursement de la taxe d’opposition.

6. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties ; par publication dans la Feuille fédérale pour la partie défenderesse.

Voies de droit: La présente décision peut être attaquée par voie de recours dans les 30 jours à dater de sa notification devant la Commission de recours en matière de propriété intellectuelle, Einsteinstrasse 2, 3003 Berne. Les mémoires de recours doivent être présentés en trois exemplaires.

22 février 2005 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

1426 2005-0349 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'opposition n° 7177/2004

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2005 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 07 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 22.02.2005 Date Data

Seite 1426-1426 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 138 406

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.