Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
RBOG 2003 Nr. 04 • OG TG RBOG 2003 Nr. 04 Generato dall'IA

Subsistence Minimum Calculation and Justification for Flat-Rate Supplement

Numero d'incarto RBOG 2003 Nr. 04
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Turgovia (CH-TG)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a lower court's calculation of subsistence minimum which included a general 20% supplement based on health status, pending divorce, and a restrictive minimum calculation. The court held that granting a blanket supplement for determining the family law necessity contradicts the established practice in the canton, which allows only for concrete supplements covering specific expenses benefiting the marital community, such as taxes or proven extraordinary outlays, based on the execution law's subsistence minimum. Since the lower court already incorporated taxes and a specific amount for medical needs exceeding the execution minimum, the additional 20% flat-rate supplement could not be justified.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 137 Abs. 2 ZGB, Art. 176 ZGB; Subsistence Minimum Calculation and Justification for Flat-Rate Supplement: The court held that granting a blanket supplement for determining the family law necessity contradicts the established practice in the canton, which allows only for concrete supplements covering specific expenses benefiting the marital community, such as taxes or proven extraordinary outlays, based on the execution law's subsistence minimum. Since the lower court already incorporated taxes and a specific amount for medical needs exceeding the execution minimum, the additional 20% flat-rate supplement could not be justified.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
minimo vitale calcolo della prestazione prestazione familiare spese mediche importo di base metodo del minimo esistenziale con ripartizione dell'eccedenza Existenzminimum: Kein pauschaler Zuschlag

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 137 Abs. 2 ZGB
[Art. 137 Abs. 2 ZGB](../og/art-137-abs-2-art-145-azgb-zgb), [Art.
Art. 176 ZGB
2 ZGB](../og/art-137-abs-2-art-145-azgb-zgb), [Art. 176 ZGB](../og/art-176-zgb)
Generato dall'IA
RBOG.2003.Nr.4
Cantonal Practice Overrides Flat Subsistence Supplement
RBOG.2020.Nr.18
Appeal Regarding Calculation of Minimum Subsistence Level in Debt Enforcement (Meal Allowance)
RBOG.2003.Nr.3
Minimum Subsistence Level Calculation in Family Law
RBOG.2018.Nr.6
Calculation of Subsistence Level for Legal Aid Eligibility

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

RBOG 2003 Nr. 04

[Skip to main content](#content)

Show navigation

* [![](../__assets-6c70d300-d9e1-41e0-9873-97087c30c22d/image/TGtemp.png)

Go to homepage](../?l=de)

1. [Rechtsprechung Obergericht](../og/)

/

2. [Entscheide RBOG](../og/entscheide)

/

3. [RBOG 2003](../og/rbog-2003)

RBOG 2003 Nr. 04

Existenzminimum: Kein pauschaler Zuschlag

---

[Art. 137 Abs. 2 ZGB](../og/art-137-abs-2-art-145-azgb-zgb), [Art. 176 ZGB](../og/art-176-zgb)

---

Die Vorinstanz berücksichtigte im Existenzminimum des Rekursgegners einen Zuschlag von 20% und begründete dies mit dem Gesundheitszustand, der anstehenden Ehescheidung und dem eher restriktiv gerechneten Existenzminimum. Die Gewährung eines pauschalen Zuschlags zur Festlegung des familienrechtlichen Notbedarfs widerspricht allerdings der im Kanton Thurgau gelebten Praxis, gemäss welcher ausgehend vom betreibungsrechtlichen Existenzminimum nur konkrete Zuschläge etwa für Steuern oder sonstige Ausgaben, die der ehelichen Gemeinschaft zugute kommen, gewährt werden (RBOG 1989 Nr. 2). Nachdem die Vorinstanz in die Existenzminimumsrechnung des Rekursgegners durchaus zutreffend bereits die Steuern sowie einen über das betreibungsrechtliche Existenzminimum hinausgehenden Betrag für medizinische Belange einbezog, kann der pauschale 20%-Zuschlag keine zusätzliche Berücksichtigung finden.

Obergericht, 16. Juni 2003, ZR.2003.30

---

×

Obergericht / Verwaltungsgericht

* Copyright © 2025 Kanton Thurgau * • Powered by Scroll Viewport & Atlassian Confluence

JavaScript errors detected

Please note, these errors can depend on your browser setup.

If this problem persists, please contact our support.

Contact Support Close