Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ZK2 2024 15 • KG SZ ZK2 2024 15 Generato dall'IA

Wrongful Termination Appeal Regarding Retaliatory Notice Validity

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2024 15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a lower court's decision regarding a wrongful termination, where the core issue was the validity of the termination notice. The appellate court upheld the lower court's finding, reasoning that the termination, issued shortly after the plaintiff asserted claims for outstanding compensation, was deemed abusive because it was retaliatory and intended to prevent the assertion of those labor rights, thereby violating principles of good faith in the employment relationship.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Wrongful Termination Appeal Regarding Retaliatory Notice Validity: The appellate court upheld the lower court's finding, reasoning that the termination, issued shortly after the plaintiff asserted claims for outstanding compensation, was deemed abusive because it was retaliatory and intended to prevent the assertion of those labor rights, thereby violating principles of good faith in the employment relationship.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cessazione d'impiego procedura per diffamazione ricorso all'autorità di vigilanza diritto di sciopero censura formulata in modo carente clausole abusive Missbräuchliche Kündigung | Arbeitsrecht
Generato dall'IA
ZK1 2019 13
Rental Termination Notice Validity Appeal Dismissal
ZK1 2017 38
Employee Termination Upheld Despite Discrimination Allegations
III 2022 31
Wrongful Termination Dispute
II 2019 83
Appeal Regarding Lawful Termination of Employment Due to Management Prerogatives and Employee Non-Cooperation
II 2020 51
Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 3. September 2024 \n ZK2 2024 15 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Pius Kistler, Gerichtsschreiberin Cornelia Spörri-Kessler. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Beklagte und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Klägerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Missbräuchliche Kündigung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen das Urteil der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht \n Einsiedeln vom 6. Februar 2024, ZEV 2023 3);-