Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ZK2 2022 17 • KG SZ ZK2 2022 17 Generato dall'IA

Denial of Legal Aid Appeal Upheld Due to Insufficient Prospect of Success

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2022 17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner sought legal aid concerning an appeal against a lower court's denial of the same request. The court reviewed the petitioner's financial situation and determined that while they met the general criteria for legal aid, the specific conditions, which require that the legal action would otherwise be hindered by the inability to bear costs, were not sufficiently met because the petitioner had not demonstrated that the underlying claim had a reasonable prospect of success, leading the court to uphold the prior decision denying free legal assistance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Denial of Legal Aid Appeal Upheld Due to Insufficient Prospect of Success: The court reviewed the petitioner's financial situation and determined that while they met the general criteria for legal aid, the specific conditions, which require that the legal action would otherwise be hindered by the inability to bear costs, were not sufficiently met because the petitioner had not demonstrated that the underlying claim had a reasonable prospect of success, leading the court to uphold the prior decision denying free legal assistance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
gratuito patrocinio probabilità di successo caso di rigore legittimazione a ricorrere aiuti all'occupazione ricorso per carenza unentgeltliche Rechtspflege | Einsiedeln ER summarisch
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2020 64
Appeal Against Denial of Legal Aid Based on Merit of Underlying Case
ZK2 2022 6
Legal Aid Denial Appeal Upheld
BEK 2020 98
Denial of Legal Aid Appeal Lacked Merit
ZK2 2019 32
Appeal Against Denial of Legal Aid Upheld
BEK 2024 133
Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Aid for Insufficient Prospects of Success

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 12. Oktober 2022 \n ZK2 2022 17 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n unentgeltliche Rechtspflege |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln vom 21. März 2022, ZES 2022 35);-

\n \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: