Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ZK2 2022 1 • KG SZ ZK2 2022 1 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Defendant (Appeal on Procedural Order)

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2022 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a lower court's order that denied a written justification for a claim concerning a monetary demand. The higher court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal was directed against a procedural order that did not definitively determine the merits of the case, and therefore, the appellate jurisdiction regarding the request for a written justification was lacking at that stage of the proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Defendant (Appeal on Procedural Order): The higher court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal was directed against a procedural order that did not definitively determine the merits of the case, and therefore, the appellate jurisdiction regarding the request for a written justification was lacking at that stage of the proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisioni incidentali legittimazione a ricorrere incompetenza per materia procedimento pregiudiziale conclusioni subordinate eccezione di incostituzionalità Forderung (schriftliche Begründung) | Zivilprozessuale Fragen
Generato dall'IA
ZK1 2017 27
Claimants v. Lower Court on Procedural Order Appealability
ZK2 2018 25
Appeal of Procedural Order Denying Justice
ZK2 2024 3
Appealability of Procedural Order
ZK2 2025 2
Appeal of Enforcement Proceedings Order
ZK2 2014 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant (Procedural Deadline Appeal)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 10. März 2022 \n ZK2 2022 1 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Michelle Mettler. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Kläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________, Beklagte und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Forderung (schriftliche Begründung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Gerichtspräsidenten am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 13. Dezember 2021, ZEV 2021 22);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: