Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ZK2 2018 7 • KG SZ ZK2 2018 7 Generato dall'IA

Spousal Protection Measures and Marital Home Allocation Appeal

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2018 7
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a lower court's decision regarding spousal protection measures, specifically concerning the allocation of the marital home and associated costs and compensation following a separation. The appellate court reviewed the lower court's decision, which had provisionally regulated the marital status, including the residence, and affirmed the original ruling, implicitly finding that the lower court had appropriately exercised its discretion in regulating the immediate post-separation living situation and financial consequences pending final divorce proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Spousal Protection Measures and Marital Home Allocation Appeal: The appellate court reviewed the lower court's decision, which had provisionally regulated the marital status, including the residence, and affirmed the original ruling, implicitly finding that the lower court had appropriately exercised its discretion in regulating the immediate post-separation living situation and financial consequences pending final divorce proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
misure a protezione dell'unione procedura di divorzio situazione familiare attribuzione dell'abitazione familiare dovere di assistenza reintegrazione negli acquisti
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2016 66
Spousal Protection Measures Appeal Affirmed
ZK2 2021 47
Appeal of Marital Protection Measures
ZK2 2020 7
Appeal of Spousal Protection Measures in Matrimonial Matters
ZK2 2017 78
Appeal Regarding Spousal Protection Measures After Marital Separation
ZK2 2021 29
Appeal of Spousal Protection Measures Ruling Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. September 2018 \n ZK2 2018 7 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Walter Christen, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsteller und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsgegnerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Eheschutz (Zuteilung eheliche Wohnung, Kostenund Entschädigungsfolgen) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 29. Dezember 2017, ZES 2016 113);- \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: