Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ZK2 2018 6 • KG SZ ZK2 2018 6 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Preliminary Maintenance Measures

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2018 6
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding preliminary maintenance measures. The appellant sought to overturn the lower court's ruling, which had established certain support obligations. The appellate court reviewed the matter, ultimately addressing the sufficiency and appropriateness of the maintenance payments ordered by the first instance court, likely finding that the original decision correctly assessed the immediate needs and financial capacities of the involved parties to set the preliminary support arrangements.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Preliminary Maintenance Measures: The appellant sought to overturn the lower court's ruling, which had established certain support obligations. The appellate court reviewed the matter, ultimately addressing the sufficiency and appropriateness of the maintenance payments ordered by the first instance court, likely finding that the original decision correctly assessed the immediate needs and financial capacities of the involved parties to set the preliminary support arrangements.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contributi di mantenimento decisione pregiudiziale procedimento pregiudiziale contributi di mantenimento provvisori sostegno finanziario ordine di pagamento vorsorgliche Massnahmen (Unterhalt) | Vors. Massnahmen Scheidung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 28. Mai 2019 \n ZK2 2018 6 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Claude Brüesch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegnerin und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsteller und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n vorsorgliche Massnahmen (Unterhalt) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 7. Dezember 2017, ZES 2016 315);- \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: