Appeal Regarding Provisional Registration of Mortgage Rights in Property Co-ownership
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involves an appeal against a lower court's decision concerning the provisional registration of mortgage rights related to property co-ownership. The dispute centered on whether the conditions for such a provisional registration were met under the relevant property law. The appellate court reasoned that the requirements for provisional registration of the mortgage rights were sufficiently established based on the evidence presented, thus upholding the lower court's decision to allow the provisional entry while dismissing the appeal filed by the party opposing the registration.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Regarding Provisional Registration of Mortgage Rights in Property Co-ownership: The dispute centered on whether the conditions for such a provisional registration were met under the relevant property law. The appellate court reasoned that the requirements for provisional registration of the mortgage rights were sufficiently established based on the evidence presented, thus upholding the lower court's decision to allow the provisional entry while dismissing the appeal filed by the party opposing the registration.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n Beschluss vom 22. Oktober 2018 \n ZK2 2018 18 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen StWEG C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Eintragung von Pfandrechten |\n \n\n
\n (Berufung gegen den Entscheid des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Gersau vom 22. Januar 2018, ZES 2017 28);- \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: