Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ZK2 2018 16 • KG SZ ZK2 2018 16 Generato dall'IA

Estate Representation Appeal Upheld

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2018 16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding estate representation, specifically concerning the appointment of a representative for the estate of a deceased person. The appellant sought to overturn the lower court's order, while the opposing parties, the estate applicants, defended the original ruling. The appellate court reviewed the circumstances surrounding the estate representation order, ultimately upholding the lower court's decision regarding the appointment of the estate representative, thereby confirming the initial ruling in favor of the estate applicants.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Estate Representation Appeal Upheld: The appellant sought to overturn the lower court's order, while the opposing parties, the estate applicants, defended the original ruling. The appellate court reviewed the circumstances surrounding the estate representation order, ultimately upholding the lower court's decision regarding the appointment of the estate representative, thereby confirming the initial ruling in favor of the estate applicants.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
successione del defunto nomina del rappresentante rappresentanza legale legittimazione a ricorrere perizia giuridica petizione d'eredità Erbenvertretung, Anordnung | Erbrecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 21. November 2018 \n ZK2 2018 16 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Bettina Krienbühl und Walter Christen, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, 2. F.________, Gesuchsteller und Berufungsgegner, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Erbenvertretung, Anordnung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 22. Januar 2018, ZES 2016 701);- \n \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: