Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ZK2 2018 13 • KG SZ ZK2 2018 13 Generato dall'IA

Revision Application Dismissed for Insufficient Grounds in Eviction Case

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2018 13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicants sought the revision of a lower court's decision concerning their eviction from a rented property, initiated by the opposing corporation. The reviewing court dismissed the application for revision because the provided documentation failed to demonstrate that the prior decision, which confirmed the eviction, was based on a factual error, thus failing to meet the stringent legal requirements for a successful revision of a judicial ruling.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Revision Application Dismissed for Insufficient Grounds in Eviction Case: The reviewing court dismissed the application for revision because the provided documentation failed to demonstrate that the prior decision, which confirmed the eviction, was based on a factual error, thus failing to meet the stringent legal requirements for a successful revision of a judicial ruling.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivi di revisione sindacato giurisdizionale procedura di sfratto revisione del piano regolatore revisione in materia d'asilo ritiro della domanda di revisione Beschwerde gegen Revisionsentscheid betreffend Mietausweisung | Mietrecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 1. Mai 2018 \n ZK2 2018 13 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdeführerin, 3. C.________, (ehemals: D.________), Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen E.________ AG, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin F.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Revision einer Mietausweisung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung [recte: Beschwerde] gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln vom 25. Januar 2018, ZES 2018 012);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: