Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ZK2 2017 5 • KG SZ ZK2 2017 5 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Cost Assessment Upheld

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2017 5
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a lower court's decision regarding cost assessments following a prior ruling. The lower court had imposed costs on the appellant, leading to the current appeal concerning the appropriateness of those cost allocations. The appellate court, after review, dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court's cost assessment was not demonstrably arbitrary or incorrect, thereby upholding the original disposition concerning the burden of costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Cost Assessment Upheld: The lower court had imposed costs on the appellant, leading to the current appeal concerning the appropriateness of those cost allocations. The appellate court, after review, dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court's cost assessment was not demonstrably arbitrary or incorrect, thereby upholding the original disposition concerning the burden of costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tassazione delle spese anticipo delle spese legittimazione a ricorrere sentenze sulla validità di un atto decisione motivata riesame di una decisione precedente Kostenbeschwerde | Kosten- und Entschädigungsfolgen
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2017 72
Appeal Regarding Assessment of Professional Fees and Costs in Prior Application Ruling
ZK2 2022 48
Cost Appeal Affirmation of Cost Assessment
STK 2019 46
Appeal Costs Allocation Upheld
BEK 2019 148
Appeal Regarding Enforcement Title Validity in Assessment Fee Dispute
ZK2 2022 49
Appeal of Court Costs Ruling

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 25. April 2017 \n ZK2 2017 5 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Cornelia Spörri-Kessler. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Kläger und Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Kostenbeschwerde |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Gersau vom 22. Dezember 2016, ZGO 2016 1);-

\n \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: