Divorce Proceeding Delay Complaint Rejection
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party in a divorce proceeding filed a complaint alleging an unreasonable delay in the legal process. The court determined that while the proceedings had indeed been protracted, the overall duration, considering the complexity of the case and the actions taken by both parties and the court, did not constitute a violation of the right to a decision without undue delay, thus rejecting the complaint.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IADivorce Proceeding Delay Complaint Rejection: The court determined that while the proceedings had indeed been protracted, the overall duration, considering the complexity of the case and the actions taken by both parties and the court, did not constitute a violation of the right to a decision without undue delay, thus rejecting the complaint.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 20. März 2017 \n ZK2 2017 4 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Bettina Krienbühl und Clara Betschart, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Rechtsverzögerung (Scheidungsverfahren) |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde vom 11. Januar 2017, ZEO 2015 55);- \n \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: