Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ZK2 2017 20 • KG SZ ZK2 2017 20 Generato dall'IA

Limited Liability Company's Appeal on Requirement to Provide Security for Costs

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2017 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a lower court's order that required the defendant, a limited liability company, to provide security for legal costs in a dispute regarding its exit from the company. The court reasoned that the appellant, as a defendant seeking to withdraw from the legal proceedings, must furnish security for the opponent's party costs as stipulated by procedural law, particularly since the appellant was a legal entity whose registered seat was outside the jurisdiction, justifying the lower court's decision to impose the security requirement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Limited Liability Company's Appeal on Requirement to Provide Security for Costs: The court reasoned that the appellant, as a defendant seeking to withdraw from the legal proceedings, must furnish security for the opponent's party costs as stipulated by procedural law, particularly since the appellant was a legal entity whose registered seat was outside the jurisdiction, justifying the lower court's decision to impose the security requirement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cauzione per le spese ripetibili società a responsabilità limitata accollo delle spese presupposto processuale titolo nominativo conclusioni subordinate
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2020 17
Security for Costs Appeal
ZK2 2021 54
Appeal Regarding Extension of Deadline for Security for Costs
ZK2 2025 28
Appeal Regarding Security Payment Requirement in Civil Proceeding
ZK2 2019 31
Appeal Regarding Security for Party Costs Based on Foreign Residence
BEK 2020 62
Company Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Substantive Reasoning Regarding Payment Order Costs

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 28. August 2017 \n ZK2 2017 20 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Bettina Krienbühl und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beklagte und Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Austritt aus GmbH (Sicherheitsleistung für Parteientschädigung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Präsidenten des Bezirksgerichts Höfe vom 28. Februar 2017, ZGO 2017 8);- \n \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: