Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ZK2 2017 16 • KG SZ ZK2 2017 16 Generato dall'IA

Opposition Action Regarding Mortgage Assumption in Deed of Sale

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2017 16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a dispute concerning an opposition action, the court reviewed a lower court's decision that dismissed the plaintiff's claim seeking to have a mortgage lien removed from a property, which the plaintiff had acquired through a deed of sale that explicitly stipulated the assumption of the existing lien, finding that the plaintiff's subsequent unilateral attempt to reject this agreed-upon contractual burden was invalid because the sale contract was effective and the plaintiff had not demonstrated any grounds, such as a vice of consent, that would invalidate the established agreement to take over the encumbrance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Opposition Action Regarding Mortgage Assumption in Deed of Sale: In a dispute concerning an opposition action, the court reviewed a lower court's decision that dismissed the plaintiff's claim seeking to have a mortgage lien removed from a property, which the plaintiff had acquired through a deed of sale that explicitly stipulated the assumption of the existing lien, finding that the plaintiff's subsequent unilateral attempt to reject this agreed-upon contractual burden was invalid because the sale contract was effective and the plaintiff had not demonstrated any grounds, such as a vice of consent, that would invalidate the established agreement to take over the encumbrance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
compravendita ipoteca pegno immobiliare contratto unilaterale assunzione di debito contratto di servitù
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 2. November 2017 \n ZK2 2017 16 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Kläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________, Beklagter und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n Widerspruchsklage nach