Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ZK2 2017 14 • KG SZ ZK2 2017 14 Generato dall'IA

Appellant's Challenge to Denial of Advance on Procedural Costs in Maintenance Case

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2017 14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant sought review of a lower court's decision regarding provisional measures for adult maintenance, specifically a request for an advance on legal costs, after being ordered to pay costs in prior proceedings. The reviewing court determined that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the required security for court costs had been provided or that the advance was refused without valid legal basis, thus upholding the lower court's decision to deny the provisional measure concerning the advance on procedural costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appellant's Challenge to Denial of Advance on Procedural Costs in Maintenance Case: The reviewing court determined that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the required security for court costs had been provided or that the advance was refused without valid legal basis, thus upholding the lower court's decision to deny the provisional measure concerning the advance on procedural costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
anticipo delle spese spese di manutenzione controllo della procedura prestazione di garanzia contributo alimentare provvisorio precetto esecutivo
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 4. Juli 2017 \n ZK2 2017 14 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Gesuchstellerin und Berufungsführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Mündigenunterhalt, vorsorgliche Massnahmen (Prozesskostenvorschuss) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 8. Februar 2017, ZEV 2016 12);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: