Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ZK2 2014 13 • KG SZ ZK2 2014 13 Generato dall'IA

Plaintiff v. Defendant (Procedural Deadline Appeal)

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2014 13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A plaintiff appealed a lower court's decision which had deemed their claim inadmissible due to a missed deadline for submitting the required authorization to sue. The appellate court reviewed the timing of the plaintiff's procedural actions against the statutory deadlines, ultimately affirming the lower court's ruling because the plaintiff failed to provide the necessary authorization for litigation within the legally prescribed timeframe following the initial procedural steps, thereby rendering the claim inadmissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Plaintiff v. Defendant (Procedural Deadline Appeal): The appellate court reviewed the timing of the plaintiff's procedural actions against the statutory deadlines, ultimately affirming the lower court's ruling because the plaintiff failed to provide the necessary authorization for litigation within the legally prescribed timeframe following the initial procedural steps, thereby rendering the claim inadmissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
termine processuale perentorio autorizzazione ad agire preclusione per tardività azione di contestazione della graduatoria tempestività dell'istanza di ricusazione decisione incidentale impugnabile Forderung, Einhaltung der Klagebewilligungsfrist | Zivilprozessuale Fragen
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 39
Appellant v. District Court: Appeal Deadline Interpretation
ZK2 2021 78
Appealability of Procedural Order Granting Deadline Extension
STK 2024 28
Appeal Timeliness and Admissibility
ZK2 2022 1
Claimant v. Defendant (Appeal on Procedural Order)
ZK1 2018 34
Appeal Untimely Due to Missed Deadline

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 12. August 2014 \n ZK2 2014 13 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Annika Flattich. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, \n Klägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Forderung, Einhaltung der Klagebewilligungsfrist |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 21. Januar 2014, ZEV 2014 1);- \n \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: