Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ZK2 2012 55 • KG SZ ZK2 2012 55 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Marital Protection Order on Visitation and Maintenance

Numero d'incarto ZK2 2012 55
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A lower court decision regarding marital protection, specifically addressing visitation rights, maintenance, and an advance on legal costs, was appealed. The appellate court reviewed the case concerning the dispute between the two parties, which originated from the single judge's order of September 17, 2012, and ultimately issued its own resolution on November 27, 2012, in response to the appeal filed against that initial ruling on marital protection matters.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Marital Protection Order on Visitation and Maintenance: The appellate court reviewed the case concerning the dispute between the two parties, which originated from the single judge's order of September 17, 2012, and ultimately issued its own resolution on November 27, 2012, in response to the appeal filed against that initial ruling on marital protection matters.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura a tutela dell'unione coniugale mantenimento del coniuge anticipo delle spese oggetto della lite diritto di visita spese di manutenzione
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 27. November 2012 \n ZK2 2012 55 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichterinnen Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiberin lic.iur. Cornelia Spörri-Kessler. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Appellant, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Appellatin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Eheschutz (Besuchsrecht, Unterhalt, Prozesskostenvorschuss) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 17. September 2012, ZES 2012 94);- \n \n \n \n hat die 2. Zivilkammer, \n nachdem sich ergeben: