Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2025 13 • KG SZ STK 2025 13 Generato dall'IA

Defendant v. Prosecution and Private Party (Appeal of Judgment)

Numero d'incarto STK 2025 13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal by a defendant against a district court judgment related to charges of threatening, insulting, and battery, where the prosecution and a private party are the appellees. The summary of the court's reasoning is not present in the provided text, as the document snippet only establishes the parties, the nature of the appeal (against the judgment of March 24, 2025), and the presiding judicial officer.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 StPO, Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO; Defendant v. Prosecution and Private Party (Appeal of Judgment): The summary of the court's reasoning is not present in the provided text, as the document snippet only establishes the parties, the nature of the appeal (against the judgment of March 24, 2025), and the presiding judicial officer.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interpretazione della sentenza azione penale privata parte al procedimento decreto penale di accusa diritto processuale diritti della difesa Drohung, Beschimpfung und Tätlichkeiten | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 StPO
The court dismissed the appeal based on this provision.
Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO
The court ordered the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings based on this provision.
Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO
The court ordered the appellant to pay procedural costs to the private party based on this provision.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant (Appeal of Criminal Charges)
STK 2022 49
Public Prosecutor v. Individual (Criminal Appeal on Mismanagement and Fraud Charges)
STK 2023 66
Private Plaintiffs' Appeal Against Criminal Court Judgment for Various Offenses
I 2024 58
Appeal of [Party A] v. [Party B]
STK 2022 73
Public Prosecutor v. Private Parties (Appeal of Affray, Harm, and Threats Judgment)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 StPO

The court dismissed the appeal based on this provision.

Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO

The court ordered the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings based on this provision.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

The court ordered the appellant to pay procedural costs to the private party based on this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 18. Juni 2025 \n STK 2025 13 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Drohung, Beschimpfung und Tätlichkeiten |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 24. März 2025, SEO 2024 28);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n