Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2025 1 • KG SZ STK 2025 1 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Attempted Theft, Trespassing, Property Damage, and Deportation Order Revocation

Numero d'incarto STK 2025 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal by the accused against a conviction for attempted theft, trespassing, property damage, and a decision regarding the revocation of a deportation order. The court, after considering the matter, reached a determination on the appeal concerning the lower court's judgment dated September 27, 2024.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO; Appeal Regarding Attempted Theft, Trespassing, Property Damage, and Deportation Order Revocation: The court, after considering the matter, reached a determination on the appeal concerning the lower court's judgment dated September 27, 2024.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tentato furto misura di allontanamento nel diritto degli stranieri azione mobiliare revoca del permesso di dimora danneggiamento violazione di domicilio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The appeal is rejected because the grounds for appeal (Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO) were not adequately substantiated.

Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO

The appellant must bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 10. Februar 2025 \n STK 2025 1 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 3. E.________ AG, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, 4. F.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 5. G.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n (versuchter) Diebstahl, Hausfriedensbruch, Sachbeschädigung, AIG, Widerruf, Landesverweisung |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts vom 27. September 2024, SGO 2024 25);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass