Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2023 5 • KG SZ STK 2023 5 Generato dall'IA

Federal Secretariat and Private Plaintiff v. Defendant (Unfair Competition Appeal)

Numero d'incarto STK 2023 5
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves appeals against a lower court's judgment concerning unfair competition, brought by two private plaintiffs, one of which was a federal economic secretariat, against a defendant. The appellate court considered the matter after the lower court had issued its decision regarding the alleged unfair competitive practices.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Federal Secretariat and Private Plaintiff v. Defendant (Unfair Competition Appeal): The appellate court considered the matter after the lower court had issued its decision regarding the alleged unfair competitive practices.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
concorrenza sleale contenzioso commerciale opposizione di terzo diritto economico concorrenza fiscale aggiudicazione all'incanto unlauterer Wettbewerb | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 79
Appeal Regarding Defamation and Unfair Competition Conviction
ZK1 2022 5
Unfair Competition Damages and Injunction Suit
BEK 2023 44
Private Complainant v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Defamation Dismissal Upheld, Unfair Competition Remanded)
BEK 2018 3
Criminal Prosecution Compensation Dispute Over Unfair Competition Claims
ZK1 2018 25
Appeal Regarding Personality Infringement under Unfair Competition Law

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n \n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n \n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Beschluss vom 16. Februar 2024 \n STK 2023 5 und 6 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n \n Mitwirkend |\n \n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, \n Kantonsrichter Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, \n Jeannette Soro und Stephan Zurfluh, \n Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n \n In Sachen |\n \n 1. Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO), Ressort Recht, \n Holzikofenweg 36, 3003 Bern, \n Privatkläger und Berufungsführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt A.________, \n 2. Fédération romande des consommateurs (FRC), \n Postfach 6151, Rue de Genève 17, 1002 Lausanne, \n Privatklägerin und Berufungsführerin, \n \n gegen \n \n 1. B.________, \n Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, \n erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, \n 2. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, \n Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, \n vertreten durch Staatsanwalt D.________, \n |\n

\n|\n \n |\n \n |\n \n|\n \n betreffend |\n \n unlauterer Wettbewerb |\n \n\n

\n (Berufungen gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts March vom 30. September 2022, SGO 2020 1);- \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: