Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2023 2 • KG SZ STK 2023 2 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Homicide and Bodily Harm Conviction and Sentence

Numero d'incarto STK 2023 2
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was convicted by the lower criminal court for offenses including intentional homicide, multiple counts of simple bodily harm, endangerment of life, and violations of traffic laws, and faced a sentence including deportation. The appellate court reviewed the appeal against this judgment, considering the prosecutor and private parties as opposing respondents, regarding the conviction and sentencing based on the established facts of the case.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

vorsätzliche Tötung, mehrfache einfache Körperverletzung, mehrfache Gefährdung des Lebens, SVG, falsche Anschuldigung, Landesverweisung | Strafgesetzbuch

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sentenza penale omicidio infrazione alle norme della circolazione lesioni semplici qualificate controllo della commisurazione della pena omicidio intenzionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to reject the appeal as inadmissible.
Art. 422 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision below was not appealable.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to order the appellant to pay the court fees.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2023 59
Appeal Against Homicide and Assault Conviction
STK 2018 37
Appeal of Negligent Homicide and Traffic Violation Conviction
STK 2019 71
Appeal Regarding Simple Bodily Harm Conviction
STK 2017 16
Appeals Concerning Attempted Homicide and Assault Conviction
STK 2023 58
Appeal Concerning Homicide, Abandonment, and Related Charges

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to reject the appeal as inadmissible.

Art. 422 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision below was not appealable.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to order the appellant to pay the court fees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 2. März 2023 \n STK 2023 2 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, 3. F.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n vorsätzliche Tötung, mehrfache einfache Körperverletzung, mehrfache Gefährdung des Lebens, SVG, falsche Anschuldigung, Landesverweisung |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 28. Oktober 2022, SGO 2022 29);- \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass