Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2023 19 • KG SZ STK 2023 19 Generato dall'IA

State v. Appellant (DUI Affirmation)

Numero d'incarto STK 2023 19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a lower court's conviction for intentional driving under the influence. The appellate court reviewed the evidence related to the appellant's intoxication and driving conduct, ultimately finding that the initial judgment was sound, which affirmed the conviction for driving while impaired.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

State v. Appellant (DUI Affirmation): The appellate court reviewed the evidence related to the appellant's intoxication and driving conduct, ultimately finding that the initial judgment was sound, which affirmed the conviction for driving while impaired.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
guida in stato di ebbrezza qualificata esame dell'alito conferma della competenza interpretazione della sentenza abbandono del procedimento per infrazione stradale prova del dolo vorsätzliches Fahren in fahrunfähigem Zustand | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 45
Appeal of Impaired Driving Conviction Upheld
STK 2018 41
State v. Defendant (Driving While Impaired Appeal)
STK 2020 9
Appeal of Intentional Driving Under the Influence Conviction
STK 2021 62
State v. Appellant (DUI, No License, Modified Failure to Render Aid After Accident)
STK 2018 2
State v. [Appellant Name]: Affirmation of Traffic Violation Conviction and Sentence

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 30. Januar 2024 \n STK 2023 19 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Walter Züger, Bettina Krienbühl, Stephan Zurfluh und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiberin Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n vorsätzliches Fahren in fahrunfähigem Zustand |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 9. Dezember 2022, SEO 2022 16);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: