Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2023 12 • KG SZ STK 2023 12 Generato dall'IA

Prosecution Appeal in Negligent Homicide and Bodily Harm Case

Numero d'incarto STK 2023 12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Cantonal Court reviewed an appeal filed by the prosecution against a lower court's judgment concerning charges of negligent homicide, multiple counts of negligent grievous bodily harm, and multiple counts of bodily harm, where the defendant was involved in an incident leading to these outcomes. The court's decision is based on its consideration of the timely filed appeal from the prosecution against the lower court's original verdict.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO; Prosecution Appeal in Negligent Homicide and Bodily Harm Case: The court's decision is based on its consideration of the timely filed appeal from the prosecution against the lower court's original verdict.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
omicidio colposo lesioni gravi querela tentata lesione personale semplice sindacato giurisdizionale impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
Used to declare the appeal by the Prosecutor's Office inadmissible.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to impose the court costs on the Prosecutor's Office because the appeal was inadmissible.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2023 59
Appeal Against Homicide and Assault Conviction
STK 2023 13
Prosecution Appeal on Negligent Homicide and Serious Bodily Harm Conviction
STK 2020 54
Prosecution Withdrawal of Appeal in Bodily Harm Case
STK 2023 57
Prosecution Appeal in Homicide and Negligence Case
STK 2020 40
Appeal Against Simple Bodily Harm Conviction

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

Used to declare the appeal by the Prosecutor's Office inadmissible.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to impose the court costs on the Prosecutor's Office because the appeal was inadmissible.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 24. Februar 2023 \n STK 2023 12 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsführerin, gegen 1. A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, 2. C.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, 3. E.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, 4. F.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, 5. G.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n fahrlässige Tötung, mehrfache fahrlässige schwere Körperverletzung, mehrfache Körperverletzung |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 23. November 2022, SGO 2022 10);- \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass

\n - die Staatsanwaltschaft gegen das im Dispositiv eröffnete Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 23. November 2022 fristgerecht Berufung anmeldete (vgl.