Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2023 1 • KG SZ STK 2023 1 Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. State: Affirmation of Attempted Grievous Bodily Harm Conviction Based on Circumstantial Intent

Numero d'incarto STK 2023 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was convicted of attempted grievous bodily harm based on an incident where the court found sufficient evidence to establish the necessary intent for the crime, despite the lack of direct proof of intent at the moment of the act. The appellate court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the objective circumstances surrounding the use of a dangerous object provided conclusive proof that the appellant intended to cause severe physical harm, thus affirming the lower court's finding beyond a reasonable doubt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. State: Affirmation of Attempted Grievous Bodily Harm Conviction Based on Circumstantial Intent: The appellate court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the objective circumstances surrounding the use of a dangerous object provided conclusive proof that the appellant intended to cause severe physical harm, thus affirming the lower court's finding beyond a reasonable doubt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lesioni personali indizio oggetto pericoloso tentato omicidio aggravato capacità delittuale impunità versuchte schwere Körperverletzung | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
STK 2020 23
Appellant v. State: Assault with a Vehicle and Related Offenses
STK 2023 26
Attempted Intentional Homicide and Forgery Appeal Affirmance
STK 2025 34
Prosecution Appeal on Attempted Aggravated Bodily Harm Conviction
STK 2019 74
State v. [Accused Name]: Appeal of Attempted Aggravated Assault and Affray Conviction
STK 2023 52
Appellant v. State: Battery Conviction Upheld Amidst Dismissal of Affray and Property Damage Charges

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 24. Oktober 2023 \n STK 2023 1 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Veronika Bürgler Trutmann und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiber Alen Draganovic. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsführer und Anschlussberufungsgegner, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n versuchte schwere Körperverletzung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 20. Juni 2022, SGO 2022 15);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: