Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 53 • KG SZ STK 2022 53 Generato dall'IA

Prosecution v. Accused: Appeal of Theft, Trespassing, and Deportation Ruling

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 53
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal and cross-appeal against a lower court's judgment regarding theft, trespassing, and deportation of an accused individual, where the prosecution was the appellant and the accused was the cross-appellant, with a private party also involved. The court's reasoning, which followed the factual findings, is central to its determination of whether the lower court's decision on the criminal liability and the resulting deportation order should be upheld or altered based on the evidence presented during the appeal proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 428 Abs. 2 StPO, Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 434 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 72 Abs. 1 StGB, Art. 68 Abs. 1 StGB; Prosecution v. Accused: Appeal of Theft, Trespassing, and Deportation Ruling: The court's reasoning, which followed the factual findings, is central to its determination of whether the lower court's decision on the criminal liability and the resulting deportation order should be upheld or altered based on the evidence presented during the appeal proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
imputazione di furto azione penale violazione della legge sugli stranieri allontanamento partenza illegale impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio Diebstahl, Hausfriedensbruch | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to reject the appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office for lack of standing to appeal regarding the acquittal on the charge of theft.
Art. 428 Abs. 2 StPO
Used to reject the subsidiary appeal filed by the accused regarding the sentence for culpable remaining in the country.
Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to reject the appeal filed by the accused regarding the acquittal on the charge of theft.
Art. 434 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
Used to dismiss the appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office as inadmissible because it challenged an acquittal of a serious offense.
Art. 72 Abs. 1 StGB
Used to confirm the conditional deportation order against the accused.
Art. 68 Abs. 1 StGB
Used to confirm the fine imposed on the accused for culpable remaining in the country.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to allocate the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2020 34
Prosecutor's Appeal on Theft, Trespassing, Damage, and Deportation
STK 2022 40
Defendant Theft Conviction Appeal and Prosecution Cross-Appeal on Sentencing and Deportation
STK 2020 35
Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Theft, Trespass, Property Damage, Deportation Appeal)
STK 2025 1
Appeal Regarding Attempted Theft, Trespassing, Property Damage, and Deportation Order Revocation
STK 2019 76
Appeal of Theft, Trespassing, and Traffic Convictions with Partially Overturned Deportation Order

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to reject the appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office for lack of standing to appeal regarding the acquittal on the charge of theft.

Art. 428 Abs. 2 StPO

Used to reject the subsidiary appeal filed by the accused regarding the sentence for culpable remaining in the country.

Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to reject the appeal filed by the accused regarding the acquittal on the charge of theft.

Art. 434 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

Used to dismiss the appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office as inadmissible because it challenged an acquittal of a serious offense.

Art. 72 Abs. 1 StGB

Used to confirm the conditional deportation order against the accused.

Art. 68 Abs. 1 StGB

Used to confirm the fine imposed on the accused for culpable remaining in the country.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to allocate the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 18. April 2023 \n STK 2022 53 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Bettina Krienbühl, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsführerin und Anschlussberufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt A.________, gegen 1. B.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsgegner und Anschlussberufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________ GmbH, Privatklägerin, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Diebstahl, Hausfriedensbruch, Landesverweisung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 15. Juni 2022, SGO 2022 4);- \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: