Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 49 • KG SZ STK 2022 49 Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor v. Individual (Criminal Appeal on Mismanagement and Fraud Charges)

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 49
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal by the public prosecutor against a judgment from the lower criminal court concerning charges against an individual, including mismanagement, failure to keep proper accounts, breach of trust, fraudulent bankruptcy, seizure fraud, and forgery, with a private claimant also participating as an appellee. The appellate court reached its decision in this matter without detailing the specific facts or its reasoning in the provided excerpt, as the text abruptly concludes after identifying the parties and the subject of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Misswirtschaft, Unterlassung der Buchführung, ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung, betrügerischer Konkurs und Pfändungsbetrug, Urkundenfälschung, Einziehung | Strafgesetzbuch

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
accusa di truffa amministrazione infedele truffa ricusazione del pubblico ministero delitto contro la persona contabilità pubblica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG
Generato dall'IA
STK 2021 44
Public Prosecutor v. Defendant (Embezzlement and Forgery Appeal)
STK 2020 35
Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Theft, Trespass, Property Damage, Deportation Appeal)
STK 2023 77
Prosecutor's Appeal in Fraud, Forgery, and Subsidy Violation Case
STK 2022 71
Prosecutor v. Accused: Appeal of Criminal Convictions and Sentencing
STK 2024 14
Private Prosecutor's Appeal Against Fraud/Embezzlement Verdict

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG)

This article governs the imposition of court costs for the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 20. Oktober 2022 \n STK 2022 49 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt A.________, gegen 1. B.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, \n vertr. durch die E.________ AG, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Misswirtschaft, Unterlassung der Buchführung, ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung, betrügerischer Konkurs und Pfändungsbetrug, Urkundenfälschung, Einziehung |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 7. Juli 2022, SGO 2021 41);- \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass