Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2022 48 • KG SZ STK 2022 48 Generato dall'IA

Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding Commercial Theft and Simple Bodily Harm Conviction and Sentence

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 48
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal and cross-appeal against a prior judgment concerning charges of commercial theft and simple bodily harm. The appellate court reviewed the conviction and sentence imposed by the lower court, which the appellant challenged regarding the findings of fact and legal application, while the prosecution cross-appealed aspects of the penalty determination. The court ultimately upheld the conviction for commercial theft and simple bodily harm, reasoning that the evidence presented sufficiently supported the factual findings of the first instance judgment regarding the planning and execution of the thefts, and that the assessment of the injuries and resulting liability was legally sound, thus dismissing both the appeal and the cross-appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding Commercial Theft and Simple Bodily Harm Conviction and Sentence: The appellate court reviewed the conviction and sentence imposed by the lower court, which the appellant challenged regarding the findings of fact and legal application, while the prosecution cross-appealed aspects of the penalty determination. The court ultimately upheld the conviction for commercial theft and simple bodily harm, reasoning that the evidence presented sufficiently supported the factual findings of the first instance judgment regarding the planning and execution of the thefts, and that the assessment of the injuries and resulting liability was legally sound, thus dismissing both the appeal and the cross-appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
furto per mestiere lesione personale semplice querela aspetti giuridici valutazione delle prove concorso reale
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 7. November 2023 \n STK 2022 48 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber Noah Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 3. E.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n|\n betreffend |\n gewerbsmässiger Diebstahl, einfache Körperverletzung (zweiter Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 21. Oktober 2019, SGO 2019 14);- \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: