Appeal of Conviction for Attempted Rape, Assault, Threats, and Insult
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe defendant appealed a lower court's judgment concerning attempted rape, simple assault, multiple counts of threats, and insult. The appellate court reviewed the case, which involved the defendant being found guilty of the mentioned offenses by the initial criminal court. The appellate court's reasoning for its final verdict (though the specific outcome is not detailed here) would be based on re-evaluating the evidence and application of law presented during the initial trial that led to the challenged conviction.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal of Conviction for Attempted Rape, Assault, Threats, and Insult: The appellate court reviewed the case, which involved the defendant being found guilty of the mentioned offenses by the initial criminal court. The appellate court's reasoning for its final verdict (though the specific outcome is not detailed here) would be based on re-evaluating the evidence and application of law presented during the initial trial that led to the challenged conviction.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Urteil vom 7. Juli 2023 \n STK 2022 45 \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Jeannette Soro, Gerichtsschreiber Noah Thurnherr. |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n
\n|\n betreffend |\n versuchte Vergewaltigung, einfache Körperverletzung, mehrfache Drohung, Beschimpfung |\n \n\n
\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts vom 19. Mai 2022, \n SGO 2022 4);-