Appeal of Criminal Conviction and Sentence for Multiple Offenses
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involves an appeal against a criminal court judgment concerning charges including trespassing, robbery, attempted robbery, attempted coercion, narcotics offenses, weapons offenses, confiscation, and deportation. The appellate court president reviewed the appeal filed by the accused challenging the prior conviction and sentence. The court's reasoning, not fully detailed in the provided snippet, would have addressed the merits of the appeal regarding the factual findings, application of law, and sentencing related to the enumerated criminal acts.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BStP; Appeal of Criminal Conviction and Sentence for Multiple Offenses: The appellate court president reviewed the appeal filed by the accused challenging the prior conviction and sentence. The court's reasoning, not fully detailed in the provided snippet, would have addressed the merits of the appeal regarding the factual findings, application of law, and sentencing related to the enumerated criminal acts.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAUsed to dismiss the appeal because the grounds for appeal were not substantiated.
Used to impose the costs of the appeal proceedings on the appellant.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 26. Juli 2022 \n STK 2022 37 \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, 3. E.________, 4. F.________, Ziff. 2-4 Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt G.________, |\n
\n|\n betreffend |\n Hausfriedensbruch, Raub, versuchter Raub, versuchte Nötigung, BetmG, WG, Einziehung, Landesverweisung |\n
\n\n
\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 6. Dezember 2021, SGO 2021 6);- \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass