Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 35 • KG SZ STK 2022 35 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Sexual Coercion and Professional Prohibition Upheld

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 35
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal by the accused against a prior judgment concerning sexual coercion, pornography, confiscation, and a prohibition on professional activity. The appellate court reviewed the decision based on the appellant's submission that the evidence was not sufficiently considered, but ultimately upheld the original verdict, reasoning that the lower court's assessment of the evidence and the resulting factual findings were logical and not demonstrably incorrect, thus affirming the conviction and sentence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Sexual Coercion and Professional Prohibition Upheld: The appellate court reviewed the decision based on the appellant's submission that the evidence was not sufficiently considered, but ultimately upheld the original verdict, reasoning that the lower court's assessment of the evidence and the resulting factual findings were logical and not demonstrably incorrect, thus affirming the conviction and sentence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
valutazione delle prove pornografia tentata coazione sessuale accertamento inesatto dei fatti impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio decisione motivata sexuelle Nötigung, Pornografie, Einziehung, Tätigkeitsverbot | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
STK 2024 6
Appeal Concerning Sexual Offenses and Sentence Review
STK 2022 55
Appeal of Pornography and Violence Conviction Upheld
STK 2022 2
Appeal of Conviction for Pornography and Depictions of Violence
STK 2019 37
Sexual Coercion Conviction and Sentence Affirmed
STK 2015 56
State v. [Appellant Name] (or Conviction Upheld in Child Sex Offense Appeal)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 25. August 2022 \n STK 2022 35 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, \n vertr. durch E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n sexuelle Nötigung, Pornografie, Einziehung, Tätigkeitsverbot |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 20. Januar 2022, SGO 2021 30);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass