Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2022 34 • KG SZ STK 2022 34 Generato dall'IA

Prosecution and Defendant Appeal Attempted Pornography Conviction and Ban

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 34
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal and cross-appeal against a lower court's judgment regarding attempted pornography and a ban on professional activities, initiated by the prosecuting authority and the accused, respectively. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties concerning the conviction and sentencing related to the attempted pornography charge and the associated professional prohibition.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecution and Defendant Appeal Attempted Pornography Conviction and Ban: The appellate court reviewed the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties concerning the conviction and sentencing related to the attempted pornography charge and the associated professional prohibition.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pornografia commisurazione della pena querela reati contro l'integrità sessuale esibizionismo sindacato giurisdizionale versuchte Pornographie, Tätigkeitsverbot | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 15. Mai 2023 \n STK 2022 34 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsführerin und Anschlussberufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt A.________, gegen B.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsgegner und Anschlussberufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n versuchte Pornographie, Tätigkeitsverbot |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Höfe vom 29. März 2022, SGO 2021 5);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass: