Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 32 • KG SZ STK 2022 32 Generato dall'IA

State v. Accused (Data Entry, Assault, Defamation Appeal)

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 32
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal by the accused against a lower court judgment concerning multiple counts of unauthorized entry into a data processing system, simple bodily harm, repeated minor assault, and defamation, where the accused sought reversal of the conviction. The appellate court, in its ruling, found that the arguments presented in the appeal did not demonstrate that the initial lower court proceedings contained errors in fact-finding or the correct application of law, thus upholding the original verdict.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

mehrfaches unbefugtes Eindringen in ein Datenverarbeitungssystem, mehrfache einfache Körperverletzung, mehrfache wiederholte Tätlichkeiten, Verleumdung | Strafgesetzbuch

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura per diffamazione vie di fatto atti penali reati informatici reato sessuale impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The appeal is dismissed, and the appellant must bear the costs of the appeal proceedings, based on this provision.
Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO
The decision to reject the appeal requires the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 1 LTF
The appellant must pay the court costs for the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 84
State v. Appellant (Assault Appeal)
STK 2018 3
State v. [Defendant Name]: Fraudulent Misuse of Data Processing System Appeal
STK 2017 68
State v. [Appellant Name] - Upholding Conviction for Threats, Insult, and Harassment
STK 2019 4
State v. Accused (Appeal of Acquittal for Attempted Coercion and Incitement)
STK 2022 20
Prosecution Appeal of Assault Conviction

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The appeal is dismissed, and the appellant must bear the costs of the appeal proceedings, based on this provision.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

The decision to reject the appeal requires the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 1 LTF

The appellant must pay the court costs for the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 6. Juli 2022 \n STK 2022 32 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, 3. F.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin G.________, 4. H.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin I.________, 5. J.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin I.________, 6. K.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin I.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n mehrfaches unbefugtes Eindringen in ein Datenverarbeitungssystem, mehrfache einfache Körperverletzung, mehrfache wiederholte Tätlichkeiten, Verleumdung |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Einsiedeln vom 6. April 2022, SGO 2021 004);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass