Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 29 • KG SZ STK 2022 29 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Narcotics, Employment, and Residency Violations

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 29
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a lower court's decision concerning multiple offenses, including violations of narcotics law, intentionally employing foreigners without permits, intentionally aiding illegal residency, and negligent misuse of identification documents. The appellate court reviewed the appeal filed by the accused against the judgment of the single judge of the District Court, ultimately upholding the prior decision based on its consideration of the established facts and legal arguments presented during the proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Vergehen gegen das Betäubungsmittelgesetz, mehrfache vorsätzliche Beschäftigung von Ausländerinnen und Ausländern ohne Bewilligung, vorsätzliche Förderung des rechtswidrigen Aufenthalts sowie fahrl. Missbrauch von Ausweisen und Schildern | Betäubungsmittelgesetz

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contravvenzione alla legge federale sugli stupefacenti attività al servizio di diversi datori di lavoro impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio istanza di autorizzazione all’esecuzione – Decisione contravvenzioni eccezione di illegalità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 430 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
This article is cited as the basis for the court's decision to dismiss the appeal.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
This article is cited for the procedure regarding the rejection of the appeal.
Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO
This article governs the imposition of costs when the appeal is dismissed.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 1 StPO
This article is cited for the allocation of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 80
State v. Appellant (Drug and Employment Violations)
STK 2019 58
Narcotics Conviction and Expulsion Appeal
STK 2023 72
Narcotics Conviction Affirmation on Appeal
STK 2023 69
Appeal Regarding Failure to Render Assistance and Narcotics Offense Conviction
STK 2020 50
Narcotics Conviction Upheld on Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 430 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

This article is cited as the basis for the court's decision to dismiss the appeal.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

This article is cited for the procedure regarding the rejection of the appeal.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO

This article governs the imposition of costs when the appeal is dismissed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 1 StPO

This article is cited for the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 25. April 2023 \n STK 2022 29 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Clara Betschart, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Vergehen gegen das Betäubungsmittelgesetz, mehrfache vorsätzliche Beschäftigung von Ausländerinnen und Ausländern ohne Bewilligung, vorsätzliche Förderung des rechtswidrigen Aufenthalts sowie fahrlässiger Missbrauch von Ausweisen und Schildern |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 2. Februar 2022, SEO 2021 5);- \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: