Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2022 26 • KG SZ STK 2022 26 Generato dall'IA

Appeals Regarding Breach of Trust Convictions and Sentencing

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 26
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns appeals against a prior judgment regarding multiple counts of breach of trust, involving a defendant appealing as both appellant and opposing party, and several private prosecutors also filing cross-appeals against the initial conviction and sentencing determined by the lower criminal court. The court reviewed the appeals concerning the alleged economic crimes, with the specific reasoning for the final verdict being withheld in the provided excerpt, as the text cuts off before the court's analysis or final determination of the contested breach of trust findings and sentences.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeals Regarding Breach of Trust Convictions and Sentencing: The court reviewed the appeals concerning the alleged economic crimes, with the specific reasoning for the final verdict being withheld in the provided excerpt, as the text cuts off before the court's analysis or final determination of the contested breach of trust findings and sentences.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
commisurazione della pena trust analisi economica violazione dei diritti della personalità impiego illecito di valori patrimoniali concorso proprio mehrfache ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Urteil vom 16. Juni 2023 \n STK 2022 26 und STK 2022 27 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Clara Betschart, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Alen Draganovic. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer sowie Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin sowie Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, 3. F.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner sowie Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, 4. G.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 5. H.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, 6. I.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 7. J.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 8. K.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 9. L.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n mehrfache ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufungen gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 19. Februar 2022, SGO 2021 23);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: